02806nam 2200757Ia 450 991081421380332120200520144314.00-19-045163-70-19-771964-31-281-76972-X97866117697270-19-970781-210.1093/oso/9780195371208.001.0001(CKB)1000000000541082(EBL)415463(OCoLC)476242568(SSID)ssj0000186443(PQKBManifestationID)11178273(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000186443(PQKBWorkID)10218866(PQKB)10643158(Au-PeEL)EBL415463(CaPaEBR)ebr10254518(CaONFJC)MIL176972(OCoLC)1406783798(StDuBDS)9780197719640(MiAaPQ)EBC415463(OCoLC) 214282508(FINmELB)ELB165792(EXLCZ)99100000000054108220080321d2009 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrJudgment calls principle and politics in constitutional law /Daniel A. Farber and Suzanna Sherry1st ed.Oxford ;New York Oxford University Press20091 online resource (218 p.)Oxford scholarship onlineFormerly CIP.UkPreviously issued in print: 2008.0-19-537120-8 Includes bibliographical references (p. 169-195) and index.Contents; 1 Introduction; I: The "Problem" of Judicial Review; II: Discretion and Judgment; III: Precedent as a Safeguard; IV: Process Safeguards; V: Internalized Safeguards; VI: Case Studies; Closing Words; Notes; Bibliographic Essay; IndexThis text tackles the important and controversial question of how judges should interpret the American Constitution. The Constitution contains a great deal of language that is vague, broad, or ambiguous, making its meaning uncertain. Many people believe this uncertainty allows judges too much discretion.Oxford scholarship online.Judicial discretionUnited StatesJudicial processUnited StatesLawUnited StatesInterpretation and constructionJudicial discretionJudicial processLawInterpretation and construction.342.73347.73/12347.7312Farber Daniel A.1950-233691Sherry Suzanna1625169MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910814213803321Judgment calls3960524UNINA