04011nam 2200685 450 991081390330332120230814224742.01-5017-2648-X10.1515/9781501726484(CKB)4100000007005375(OCoLC)1038025942(MdBmJHUP)muse67671(MiAaPQ)EBC5552123(StDuBDS)EDZ0002048889(DE-B1597)503504(DE-B1597)9781501726484(Au-PeEL)EBL5552123(CaPaEBR)ebr11624234(EXLCZ)99410000000700537520181106d2018 uy 0engur|||||||nn|ntxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierThe commander's dilemma violence and restraint in wartime /Amelia Hoover GreenIthaca ;London :Cornell University Press,2018.1 online resource (1 online resource.)Cornell scholarship onlineBased on the author's thesis (Ph.D.)--Yale University, 2011.1-5017-2647-1 1-5017-2649-8 Includes bibliographical references and index.Introduction : repertoires and restraint -- The commander's dilemma -- Setting the context : the history of El Salvador's civil war -- Comparing state and FMLN institutions and ideologies -- FMLN institutions and ideologies in depth -- Repertoires of violence in the Salvadoran civil war, 1980-1992 -- The commander's dilemma beyond El Salvador.Why do some military and rebel groups commit many types of violence, creating an impression of senseless chaos, whereas others carefully control violence against civilians? A classic catch-22 faces the leaders of armed groups and provides the title for Amelia Hoover Green's book. Leaders need large groups of people willing to kill and maim-but to do so only under strict control. How can commanders control violence when fighters who are not under direct supervision experience extraordinary stress, fear, and anger? The Commander's Dilemma argues that discipline is not enough in wartime. Restraint occurs when fighters know why they are fighting and believe in the cause-that is, when commanders invest in political education.Drawing on extraordinary evidence about state and nonstate groups in El Salvador, and extending her argument to the Mano River wars in Liberia and Sierra Leone, Amelia Hoover Green shows that investments in political education can improve human rights outcomes even where rational incentives for restraint are weak-and that groups whose fighters lack a sense of purpose may engage in massive violence even where incentives for restraint are strong. Hoover Green concludes that high levels of violence against civilians should be considered a "default setting," not an aberration.Cornell scholarship online.Political violencePsychological aspectsCommand of troopsPsychological aspectsCivilians in warViolence againstEl SalvadorControl (Psychology)Political violenceEl SalvadorHistory20th centuryPolitical socializationEl SalvadorHistory20th centuryCivilians in warViolence againstEl SalvadorPolitics and government1979-1992Political violencePsychological aspects.Command of troopsPsychological aspects.Civilians in warViolence againstControl (Psychology)Political violenceHistoryPolitical socializationHistoryCivilians in warViolence against.355.3/3041Hoover Green Amelia1678553MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910813903303321The commander's dilemma4046296UNINA