02700nam 2200589 450 991081255770332120200520144314.01-78023-455-4(CKB)2670000000594126(EBL)1939080(SSID)ssj0001467720(PQKBManifestationID)11786049(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001467720(PQKBWorkID)11519963(PQKB)10514586(MiAaPQ)EBC1939080(Au-PeEL)EBL1939080(CaPaEBR)ebr11017493(CaONFJC)MIL726370(OCoLC)903442351(EXLCZ)99267000000059412620150217h20152015 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrAppetites for thought philosophers and food /Michel OnfrayLondon, England :Reaktion Books,2015.©20151 online resource (138 p.)Description based upon print version of record.1-78023-445-7 1-322-95088-1 Includes bibliographical references.Cover; Appetites for Thought: Philosophers and Food; Imprint Page; Contents; Introduction: The Banquet of the Omnivores; One: Diogenes; or, The Taste of Octopus; Two: Rousseau; or, The Milky Way; Three: Kant; or, Ethical Alcoholism; Four: Fourier; or, The Pivotal Little Pie; Five: Nietzsche; or, The Sausages of the Anti-Christ; Six: Marinetti; or, The Excited Pig; Seven: Sartre; or, The Revenge of the Crustaceans; Conclusion: The Gay Science of Eating; References; BibliographyAppetites for Thought offers up a delectable intellectual challenge: can we better understand the concepts of philosophers from their culinary choices? Guiding us around the philosopher's banquet table with erudition, wit, and irreverence, Michel Onfray offers surprising insights on foods ranging from fillet of cod to barley soup, from sausage to wine and coffee.Tracing the edible obsessions of philosophers from Diogenes to Sartre, Onfray considers how their ideas relate to their diets. Would Diogenes have been an opponent of civilization without his taste for raw octopus? Would Rousseau have FoodPhilosophyEthicsFoodPhilosophy.Ethics.190Onfray Michel472123Barry Donald1947-Muecke Stephen1951-MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910812557703321Appetites for thought4114956UNINA