03739nam 2200697 450 991081243190332120230807205244.03-11-042429-03-11-042437-110.1515/9783110424294(CKB)3710000000519847(EBL)4338484(SSID)ssj0001583133(PQKBManifestationID)16260216(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001583133(PQKBWorkID)14861355(PQKB)10583761(MiAaPQ)EBC4338484(DE-B1597)451904(OCoLC)944074516(DE-B1597)9783110424294(Au-PeEL)EBL4338484(CaPaEBR)ebr11146727(CaONFJC)MIL888872(OCoLC)933779350(EXLCZ)99371000000051984720160212h20152015 uy 0engur||#||||||||txtccrReading between the lines - Leo Strauss and the history of early modern philosophy /edited by Winfried SchröderBerlin, [Germany] ;Boston, [Massachusetts] :De Gruyter,2015.©20151 online resource (232 p.)New Studies in the History and Historiography of Philosophy,2364-3161 ;Volume 3Description based upon print version of record.3-11-042430-4 3-11-042749-4 Includes bibliographical references and index.Front matter --Table of Contents --Introduction --Leo Strauss and the Radical Enlightenment --The Irrelevance of (Straussian) Hermeneutics --The Virtues and Vices of Leo Strauss, Historian --Leo Strauss’s Olympian Interpretation: Right, Self-preservation, and Law in The Political Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes --Art of Writing or Art of Rewriting? --Resurrecting Leo Strauss --Spinoza, Strauss, and the Morality of Lying for Safety and Peace --Pierre Bayle and the Red Herring --Subject index --Index of NamesSince its publication in 1952, Leo Strauss's Persecution and the Art of Writing has stirred considerable controversy, particularly among historians concerned with early modern philosophy. On the one hand, several scholars share his view that it would be inadequate to generally take at face value the explicit message of texts which were composed in an era in which severe sanctions were imposed on those who entertained deviating views. ‘Reading between the lines’ therefore seems to be the appropriate hermeneutical approach. On the other hand, the risks of such an interpretative maxim are more than obvious, as it might come up to an unlimited license to ascribe heterodox doctrines to early modern philosophers whose manifest teachings were in harmony with the orthodox positions of their time. The contributions to this volume both address these methodological issues and discuss paradigmatic cases of authors who might indeed be candidates for a Straussian ‘reading between the lines’: Hobbes, Spinoza, and Bayle.New studies in the history and historiography of philosophy.Philosophy, ModernMethodologyHermeneutics.atheism.early modern philosophy.free thought.Philosophy, Modern.Methodology.181/.06Schröder WinfriedMiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910812431903321Reading between the lines - Leo Strauss and the history of early modern philosophy2399927UNINA