03347nam 2200613 a 450 991081178350332120200520144314.01-282-39964-0978661239964090-474-4367-510.1163/ej.9789004169722.i-314(CKB)1000000000821802(EBL)468086(OCoLC)647871852(SSID)ssj0000337403(PQKBManifestationID)11278198(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000337403(PQKBWorkID)10289675(PQKB)11368531(MiAaPQ)EBC468086(OCoLC)230729546(nllekb)BRILL9789047443674(Au-PeEL)EBL468086(CaPaEBR)ebr10363778(PPN)184924111(EXLCZ)99100000000082180220080520d2008 uy 0gerur|n|---|||||txtccrEtiam realis scientia Petrus Aureolis konzeptualistische Transzendentalienlehre vor dem Hintergrund seiner Kritik am Formalitatenrealismus /von Caroline Gaus1st ed.Leiden ;Boston Brill20081 online resource (328 p.)Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters,0169-8028 ;Bd. 100Description based upon print version of record.90-04-16972-5 Includes bibliographical references (p. [297]-304) and indexes.Vorläufige Material /C.F. Gaus -- 1. Einleitung /C.F. Gaus -- 2. Die INNere Spannung der scotischen Metaphysikkonzeption: Die Syste Matische Bedeutung des Formalitätenrealismus für die Transzenden Talienlehre /C.F. Gaus -- 3. Die ontologischen Prämissen einer formalistischen Transzendentalienlehre /C.F. Gaus -- 4. Aureolis Konzeptualistische Interpretation der Transzendentalien /C.F. Gaus -- 5. Schluß /C.F. Gaus -- Quellen- Und literaturverzeichnis /C.F. Gaus -- Index nominum /C.F. Gaus -- Index rerum /C.F. Gaus -- Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters /C.F. Gaus.Research on the medieval doctrine of the transcendentals is still characterized by one debate: its characteristic peculiarity vs. its structural correspondence to the modern concept of transcendentality. The present study on Peter Aureol’s († 1322) doctrine of transcendentals offers a contribution to that discussion by delimiting from both directions: by developing Aureol’s position in contrast to the contemporary position of a scotist-orientated, formalistic realism, it sheds light on the innovative traits in his doctrine. On the other hand, Aureol’s logico-semantical revision of metaphysics is presented as an intentional affirmation of tradition, so that a revised view can be taken of Aureol’s role within the development of a modern metaphysics of the object as such.Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters ;Bd. 100.TranscendentalsTranscendentals.111/.8Gaus Caroline629444MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910811783503321Etiam realis scientia1224598UNINA