01144nam--2200385---450-99000154327020331620050621144436.0000154327USA01000154327(ALEPH)000154327USA0100015432720040329d1949----km-y0itay0103----bafreFR||||||||001yyTraitè d'histoire des religionsMircea Eliadepréface de Georges DumézilParisPayot1949405 p.23 cmBibliothèque scientifique2001Bibliothèque scientifique2001001-------2001ELIADE,Mircea127461DUMÉZIL,GeorgesITsalbcISBD990001543270203316II.2. 3122 (IV C 314)971 L.M.IV CBKUMASIAV41020040329USA011250SIAV41020040329USA011252PATRY9020040406USA011747COPAT49020050621USA011444Traité d'histoire des religions14624UNISA05683nam 2200649 450 991081053510332120230803195414.01-4619-5836-990-272-7067-8(CKB)2670000000536183(EBL)1641889(SSID)ssj0001131219(PQKBManifestationID)11637925(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001131219(PQKBWorkID)11112354(PQKB)11582924(MiAaPQ)EBC1641889(Au-PeEL)EBL1641889(CaPaEBR)ebr10843141(CaONFJC)MIL578510(OCoLC)871635946(EXLCZ)99267000000053618320140106h20142014 uy| 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrUniversals in second scholasticism a comparative study with focus on the theories of Francisco Suarez S.J. (1548-1617), Joao Poinsot O.P. (1589-1644) and Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola O.F.M. Conv. (1602-1673), Bonaventura Belluto O.F.M. Conv. (1600-1676) /Daniel Heider, Faculty of Theology, University of South Bohemia, Institute of Philosophy, The Academy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicPhiladelphia :John Benjamins Publishing Company,[2014]©20141 online resource (356 p.)Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie,1384-668X ;Band 54Description based upon print version of record.90-272-1464-6 Includes bibliographical references and indexes.UNIVERSALS IN SECOND SCHOLASTICISM; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Dedication page; Acknowledgments; Table of contents; 1. Introduction; 1.1 The issue of universals in Scholasticism; 1.2 Historical context: Thomism, Nominalism, Jesuit philosophy and Scotism; 1.3 Goal and methodology; 1.4 State of research; 2. Francisco Suárez (1548-1617) on universals; 2.1 Universals in Disputationes Metaphysicae and De Anima; 2.2 The metaphysics of universals: Formal and individual unity; 2.2.1 Nomenclature and historical point of departure2.2.2 Scotus on the common nature according to Suárez's Disputationes Metaphysicae VI, s. 12.2.3 Suárez's "nominalization" of Scotus; 2.3.1 Suárez on the distinction between formal and universal unity; 2.3 Formal and universal unity; 2.3.2 Fonseca on universal unity and the aptitude to being in the many; 2.3.3 Suárez's dismissal of Fonseca's unity of precision; 2.3.4 Suárez on the aptitude to being in the many; 2.4 The metaphysical grades and their distinction; 2.4.1 Scotistic arguments for the distinction ex natura rei; 2.4.2 Suárez on the distinction between the metaphysical grades2.5.1 Features of Suárez's cognitive psychology: Intellectual knowledge2.5 The epistemology of universals; 2.5.2 Intellectual cognition of material singulars; 2.5.3 Direct and comparative acts of the intellect; 2.5.4 The first/second intentions and the "quiddity" of the logical universal; 2.6 Hurtado's "confundism" and Suárez's moderate realism; 2.7 Summary; 3 João Poinsot (1589-1644) on universals; 3.1 Universals in Cursus philosophicus Thomisticus; 3.2 Different meanings of universale; 3.3 Universale materialiter sumptum; 3.3.1 Rejection of Platonism, Ultrarealism and Nominalism3.3.2 Formal unity and negative community3.3.3 Formal unity and the aptitude to being in the many; 3.3.4 Distinctio virtualis intrinseca and the metaphysical grades; 3.3.5 Individuation, subsistence, existence and universals; 3.4 Universale metaphysicum; 3.4.1 Some features of Poinsot's cognitive psychology; 3.4.2 Knowledge of material singulars; 3.4.3 The metaphysical universal: Representational and cognitional aspect; 3.4.4 The extrinsic denomination and the first objective intention; 3.5 Universale logicum; 3.5.1 The "quiddity" of the logical universal: Esse in or dici de?3.5.2 Formation of the logical universal3.6 Summary; 4. Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola (1602-1673)/Bonaventura Belluto (1600-1676) on universals; 4.1 Universals in Cursus ad mentem Scoti; 4.2 Division of universale; 4.3.1 Anti-Nominalism and Anti-Platonism of Mastri's/Belluto's Doctrine; 4.3 Universale metaphysicum remotum; 4.3.2 Objective precision, formal distinction and the metaphysical grades; 4.3.3 The extramental character of the community of the common nature; 4.3.4 Community per indifferentiam, or per inexistentiam?4.3.5 Formal unity of the common nature: Essential and existential orderThis study aims to present a comparative analysis of philosophical theories of universals espoused by the foremost representatives of the three main schools of early modern scholastic thought. The book introduces the doctrines of Francisco Suárez, S.J. (1548-1617), the Thomist John of St. Thomas, O.P. (1589-1644), and the Scotists Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola, O.F.M. Conv. (1602-1673) and Bonaventura Belluto, O.F.M. Conv. (1600-1676). The author examines in detail their mutual doctrinal delineation as well as the conceptualist tenet of the Jesuit Pedro Hurtado de Mendoza (1578-1641), whose thoBochumer Studien zur Philosophie ;Band 54.Neo-ScholasticismUniversals (Philosophy)Neo-Scholasticism.Universals (Philosophy)111/.209Heider Daniel861991MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910810535103321Universals in second scholasticism4017043UNINA