03266nam 2200661 a 450 991080991380332120200520144314.01-107-12468-91-280-42142-80-511-17636-80-511-04193-40-511-15713-40-511-30439-00-511-49551-X0-511-04458-5(CKB)1000000000008230(EBL)202065(OCoLC)475916611(SSID)ssj0000265374(PQKBManifestationID)11195058(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000265374(PQKBWorkID)10295332(PQKB)11284889(UkCbUP)CR9780511495519(Au-PeEL)EBL202065(CaPaEBR)ebr10063489(CaONFJC)MIL42142(MiAaPQ)EBC202065(PPN)181319543(EXLCZ)99100000000000823020010326d2002 uy 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierUnjustified enrichment key issues in comparative perspective /edited by David Johnston and Reinhard Zimmermann1st ed.Cambridge, U.K. ;New York Cambridge University Press20021 online resource (xlii, 749 pages) digital, PDF file(s)Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).0-521-18744-3 0-521-80820-0 Includes bibliographical references and index.Introduction -- Enrichment "without legal ground" or unjust factor approach -- Failure of consideration -- Duress and fraud -- Change of position -- Illegality -- Encroachment and restitution for wrongs -- Improvements -- Discharge of another person's debt -- Third-party enrichment -- Proprietary issues -- Taxonomy.Unjustified enrichment has been one of the most intellectually vital areas of private law. There is, however, still no unanimity among civil-law and common-law legal systems about how to structure this important branch of the law of obligations. Several key issues are considered comparatively in this 2002 book, including grounds for recovery of enrichment, defences, third-party enrichment, as well as proprietary and taxonomic questions. Two contributors deal with each topic, one a representative of a common-law system, the other a representative of a civil-law or mixed system. This approach illuminates not just similarities or differences between systems, but also what different systems can learn from one another. In an area of law whose territory is still partially uncharted and whose borders are contested, such comparative perspectives will be valuable for both academic analysis of the law and its development by the courts.Unjust enrichmentUnjust enrichment.346.02/9Johnston David1961-1667969Zimmermann Reinhard1952 Oct. 10-148437MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910809913803321Unjustified enrichment4187226UNINA