02508nam 2200613 a 450 991078637670332120200520144314.01-283-61643-297866139288870-8108-6944-6(CKB)2670000000275768(EBL)1126448(OCoLC)850197365(SSID)ssj0000756441(PQKBManifestationID)12366756(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000756441(PQKBWorkID)10750910(PQKB)11089646(MiAaPQ)EBC1126448(Au-PeEL)EBL1126448(CaPaEBR)ebr10613575(CaONFJC)MIL392888(EXLCZ)99267000000027576820090318d2009 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrThe new Broadway song companion[electronic resource] an annotated guide to musical theatre literature by voice type and song style /David P. DeVenney[Rev. ed.].Lanham [Md.] Scarecrow Press20091 online resource (298 p.)Rev. ed. of: The Broadway song companion. 1998.Includes indexes.0-8108-6943-8 Songs for solo voices -- Soprano -- Mezzo-soprano -- Tenor -- Bass/Baritone -- Duets -- Trios -- Quartets and small ensembles -- Choruses and company numbers -- Composers and lyricists -- Publishers' addresses and websites.This volume presents a comprehensive listing of the musical numbers from over 300 Broadway shows. Each song is annotated with the name of the character who sings it, the voice type, the exact vocal range, and a description of the song style. A set of six indexes allows access to this music by voice type (soprano, baritone, etc.), song style (uptempo, ballad, etc.), vocal arrangement (duets, trios, chorus, etc.), and composer and lyricist.MusicalsBibliographyPopular musicBibliographyVoice types (Singing)Handbooks, manuals, etcMusicalsPopular musicVoice types (Singing)016.7821/4DeVenney David P.1958-1088874DeVenney David P.1958-1088874MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910786376703321The new Broadway song companion3785965UNINA06033nam 2200769 450 991080917950332120230803205352.090-272-6969-6(CKB)3710000000249122(EBL)1798767(SSID)ssj0001347019(PQKBManifestationID)12527829(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001347019(PQKBWorkID)11364330(PQKB)11700034(MiAaPQ)EBC1798767(Au-PeEL)EBL1798767(CaPaEBR)ebr10944084(CaONFJC)MIL651867(OCoLC)891721997(EXLCZ)99371000000024912220141009h20142014 uy 0engurcnu||||||||txtccrAdvances in the syntax of DPs structure, agreement, and case /edited by Anna Bondaruk, Gréte Dalmi, Alexander Grosu ; contributors, Artur Bartnik [and twelve others]Amsterdam, Netherlands ;Philadelphia, Pennsylvania :John Benjamins Publishing Company,2014.©20141 online resource (338 p.)Linguistik Aktuell =Linguistics Today,0166-0829 ;Volume 217Description based upon print version of record.1-322-20587-6 90-272-5700-0 Includes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index.Advances in the Syntax of DPs; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Dedication page; Table of content; List of contributors; List of abbreviations; List of figures; Editors' note; Preface; Introduction; References; The overgeneration problem and the case of semipredicatives in Russian; 1. Introduction; 2. Some empirical and conceptual issues; 2.1 "Divided" control; 2.2 The problem of variation; 3. Some alternative approaches; 3.1 Vertical binding; 3.2 Control as movement; 3.3 A probe-goal and Agree account; 3.4 A government and binding account; 4. Comparison of approaches: Overarching issues4.1 Agreement in case 4.2 Variation; 4.3 Avoiding overgeneration; 5. Semipredicatives versus other adjectives; 5.1 Some data and puzzles; 5.2 Direct assignment; 6. Components of a solution; 6.1 Some leading ideas; 6.1.1 Agreement versus assignment; 6.1.2 Dative versus instrumental; 6.1.3 Arguments versus adjuncts; 6.2 Predicate adjective agreement is local; 6.2.1 Structure is parsimonious; 6.3 Semipredicatives versus ordinary adjectives; 6.3.1 Why ordinary adjectives do not enter into the SD; 6.3.2 Why semipredicatives are not default instrumental6.3.3 Why ordinary adjectives always have an instrumental option 6.3.4 Why semipredicatives must agree where ordinary adjectives can; 6.3.5 Why agreement under obligatory Object Control is only possible for semipredicatives; 6.4 Brief thoughts on variation; 6.5 Movement, multi-attachment, timing, and feature sharing; References; Polish equatives as symmetrical structures; 1. Introduction; 2. Inventory of Polish equatives; 3. How do equatives differ from predicational and specificational clauses in Polish?; 3.1 Predicational and specificational clauses in Polish3.2 Equatives vs. predicational and specificational clauses in Polish 4. Asymmetrical structure for Polish equatives; 5. Symmetrical structure of Polish equatives; 5.1 Pereltsvaig's (2001, 2007) analysis; 5.2 Pereltsvaig's analysis applied to Polish; 6. Summary; References; Syntactic (dis)agreement is not semantic agreement; 1. Introduction; 2. Two types of number mismatch; 2.1 Singulars with plural agreement ('sg/pl'); 2.2 Plurals with singular agreement ('pl/sg'); 2.3 The proposal; 3. Two types of number mismatch: Empirical evidence; 3.1 Distribution: Copular clauses versus verbal predicates3.2 Binding and control 3.3 Semantic properties of the subject; 3.3.1 Quantification; 3.3.2 Definiteness, specificity and genericity; 3.4 Productivity; 4. An analysis of phi-feature mismatches; 4.1 Previous proposals; 4.2 Against a one-level model; 4.3 A two-level model of agreement; 4.4 Application to pl/sg and sg/pl; 4.5 Residual problems; 5. Conclusion; References; A note on oblique case; 1. Introduction; 2. Oblique case, indeclinable nominals, and a Case Realization Condition; 2.1 Undeclined nominals; 2.2 Oblique case and a case realization requirement; 3. The Puzzle4. Oblique case is uniformly P-governed: The P-copying proposalThis chapter argues for the view that Standard Free Relatives and Transparent Free Relatives have exactly the same bi-dimensional configurational structures, and against the view that they have distinct multi-dimensional structures, the transparent variety being externally headed by a token of a CP-internal post-copular phrase. It is argued that the proposed view yields superior analyses of the following facts: [i] Transparent Free Relatives are typically construed as existentially quantified, regardless of the quantificational force of the pivot, and [ii] certain case mismatch effects, predicLinguistik aktuell ;Volume 217.Grammar, Comparative and generalSyntaxGrammar, Comparative and generalDeterminersGrammar, Comparative and generalCaseSemanticsDefiniteness (Linguistics)Grammar, Comparative and generalSyntax.Grammar, Comparative and generalDeterminers.Grammar, Comparative and generalCase.Semantics.Definiteness (Linguistics)415Bondaruk AnnaDalmi GréteGrosu AlexanderBartnik ArturTrugman Helen(1962-2012),MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910809179503321Advances in the syntax of DPs3932389UNINA