02826nam 2200613Ia 450 991080887680332120200520144314.01-4623-5887-X1-4527-2289-71-283-51762-097866138300741-4519-0945-4(CKB)3360000000443933(EBL)3014493(SSID)ssj0000944128(PQKBManifestationID)11560553(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000944128(PQKBWorkID)10982533(PQKB)11216082(OCoLC)694141177(MiAaPQ)EBC3014493(IMF)WPIEE2006232(EXLCZ)99336000000044393320070614d2006 uf 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrGender budgeting /Janet G. Stotsky1st ed.[Washington, D.C.] International Monetary Fund, Fiscal Affairs Dept.20061 online resource (52 p.)IMF working paper ;WP/06/232"October 2006".1-4518-6492-2 ""Contents""; ""I. INTRODUCTION""; ""II. MEASURING GENDER INEQUALITIES AND GENDER EQUITY INDEXES""; ""III. GENDER BUDGETING: CONCEPTS AND FRAMEWORK""; ""IV. GENDER BUDGETING: EXPERIENCES""; ""V. CONCLUSIONS""; ""REFERENCES""Women are disadvantaged relative to men, according to key economic, social, and political measures of equality, but in many areas, such as education, differences are narrowing. The concept of externalities underlies the arguments for including gender considerations in budget programs and policies. Other arguments have a weaker economic basis but may be more socially or politically compelling. The experience to date with "gender budgeting," which entails looking at gender issues comprehensively within the budget, has been mixed. To become more useful, gender budgeting should be integrated into budget processes in a way that generates tangible improvements in policy outcomes. The International Monetary Fund should encourage fiscal authorities to take into account the external benefits of reducing gender inequalities and to remove from fiscal legislation any arbitrary discrimination against women.IMF working paper ;WP/06/232.EqualityExpenditures, PublicSex discriminationEquality.Expenditures, Public.Sex discrimination.Stotsky Janet Gale1094931International Monetary Fund.Fiscal Affairs Dept.MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910808876803321Gender Budgeting3986734UNINA