02506nam 2200373 450 991013205970332120240214140201.01-4123-5186-3(CKB)3680000000169447(NjHacI)993680000000169447(EXLCZ)99368000000016944720240214d2006 uy 0freur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierOuvrir les sciences sociales rapport de la Commission Gulbenkian pour la restructuration des sciences sociales /Immanuel Maurice WallersteinChicoutimi :J.-M. Tremblay,2006.1 online resourceClassiques des sciences socialesPrésentation du livre et des auteurs -- -- Avant-propos -- -- Chapitre I. La construction historique des sciences sociales -- -- Chapitre II. Les débats au sein des sciences sociales -- -- 1. La validité des distinctions entre les sciences sociales -- 2. Jusqu'à quel point l'héritage de la science sociale est-il provincial ? -- 3. La réalité et la validité de la distinction entre les « deux cultures » -- Chapitre III. Quel type de science sociale allons-nous maintenant construire ? -- -- 1. L'Homme et la nature -- 2. L'État en tant que bloc de construction analytique -- 3. L'universel et le particulier -- 4. L'objectivité -- Conclusion. Restructurer les sciences sociales -- -- 1. L'expansion d'institutions, appartenant ou associées aux universités, qui rassembleraient des spécialistes pour un travail commun d'une année autour de thèmes urgents spécifiques -- -- 2. L'instauration de programmes de recherche intégrés dans les structures universitaires, qui traversent les lignes traditionnelles, ont des objectifs intellectuels spécifiques, et disposent de fond pour une période limitée (par exemple cinq ans). -- -- 3. L'affi1iation conjointe obligatoire des professeurs -- -- 4. Travail conjoint des étudiants de troisième cycle -- Membres de la Commission Gulbenkian.Classiques des sciences sociales.Ouvrir les sciences sociales Social sciencesSocial sciences.613Wallerstein Immanuel Maurice119702NjHacINjHaclBOOK9910132059703321Ouvrir les sciences sociales3979517UNINA04092nam 2200589 450 991080788610332120190826145055.090-04-29319-110.1163/9789004293199(CKB)3710000000445687(MiAaPQ)EBC2110730(OCoLC)910964845(OCoLC)914217704(OCoLC)919075930(nllekb)BRILL9789004293199(PPN)195379209(EXLCZ)99371000000044568720150805h20152015 uy 0engurcnu||||||||rdacontentrdamediardacarrierThe third way a plea for a balanced cannabis policy /by Cyrille J. C. F. Frijnaut, Brice de RuyverLeiden, Netherlands ;Boston, Massachusetts :Koninklijke Brill,2015.©20151 online resource (238 pages)Nijhoff Law Specials,0924-4549 ;Volume 87"Translation by Mark van Dyck."90-04-29318-3 Includes bibliographical references and index.Preliminary Material /Fijnaut Fijnaut and Brice De Ruyver -- 1 General Introduction: A Way Out of the Deadlock /Fijnaut Fijnaut and Brice De Ruyver -- 2 The United Nations and Cannabis Policy /Fijnaut Fijnaut and Brice De Ruyver -- 3 Cannabis Policy in the Americas /Fijnaut Fijnaut and Brice De Ruyver -- 4 Cannabis Policy in the European Union /Fijnaut Fijnaut and Brice De Ruyver -- 5 The Dutch Cannabis Policy /Fijnaut Fijnaut and Brice De Ruyver -- 6 General Conclusion: Towards a Third Way /Fijnaut Fijnaut and Brice De Ruyver -- Bibliography /Fijnaut Fijnaut and Brice De Ruyver -- Index /Fijnaut Fijnaut and Brice De Ruyver.What is sensible when it comes to developing and implementing a policy with regard to products which in the case of regular use are harmful, but which at the same time exert a strong attraction, even so strong that people (may) become dependent on or addicted to them? This question relates to many illicit drugs, but these days it is, both nationally and internationally, mainly related to the policy regarding the production, distribution and consumption of cannabis. Generally speaking, the legalization of cannabis in Uruguay and in some states of the United States of America, in particular Colorado and Washington State, has given a powerful impetus to the discussion about the cannabis policy. In the Netherlands, that discussion has become increasingly relevant over the past years because of the struggle of coffeeshop owners and political parties. This volume offers the first English-language analysis of the situation in the Netherlands in order to make a contribution to the international debate on this heated topic. Since the 1960s, the Dutch cannabis policy has been an important point of reference in the international discussion about the policy that should be pursued regarding the use of cannabis. However, in international and foreign literature about cannabis policy the developments in the Netherlands are often depicted in an incomplete or one-sided manner, which has a negative impact on the quality of the international debate about what has happened and what should happen now. This volume seeks to redress that imbalance.Nijhoff law specials ;Volume 87.MarijuanaLaw and legislationEuropeMarijuanaLaw and legislationNetherlandsMarijuanaLaw and legislationCannabisDrug legalizationMarijuanaLaw and legislationMarijuanaLaw and legislationMarijuanaLaw and legislation.Cannabis.Drug legalization.362.29/5561Fijnaut Cyrille1946-235069de Ruyver BriceMiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910807886103321The third way4025617UNINA