02690nam 2200589 450 991080611360332120230803205534.01-59332-792-7(CKB)3710000000259936(EBL)1812569(SSID)ssj0001349821(PQKBManifestationID)12433439(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001349821(PQKBWorkID)11402918(PQKB)10131154(MiAaPQ)EBC1812569(Au-PeEL)EBL1812569(CaPaEBR)ebr10951599(OCoLC)892910414(EXLCZ)99371000000025993620141018h20142014 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrDialogue among state supreme courts advancing state constitutionalism /Mark W. DennistonEl Paso, Texas :LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC,2014.©20141 online resource (231 p.)Law and Society : Recent ScholarshipDescription based upon print version of record.1-59332-759-5 Includes bibliographical references and index.Describing dialogue -- Ohio case study -- Developing a nine state research design -- Reporting the empirical results -- Sister state dialogue and the good faith exception -- Interviews with state supreme court justices -- Challenges and future research.State supreme courts use state constitutional provisions to afford their citizens state constitutional rights beyond the protections that the U.S. Supreme Court has interpreted the U.S. Constitution to require. As state supreme courts consider expanding state constitutional rights they engage in an ongoing dialogue with their sister state supreme courts. Results indicate this dialogue amongst state supreme courts influences decisions interpreting state constitutional rights. Denniston demonstrates through analysis of state supreme court decisions and interviews with state supreme court justiceLaw and SocietyConstitutional lawUnited StatesStatesCasesCourts of last resortUnited StatesStatesJudicial processUnited StatesStatesConstitutional lawStatesCourts of last resortStates.Judicial processStates.342.7308Denniston Mark W.1975-1599447MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910806113603321Dialogue among state supreme courts3922142UNINA