05029nam 2200721 450 991079828520332120230808191920.0(CKB)3710000000609787(EBL)4441474(SSID)ssj0001624635(PQKBManifestationID)16361798(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001624635(PQKBWorkID)14916875(PQKB)10975055(PQKBManifestationID)16343133(PQKBWorkID)14916876(PQKB)22869972(MiAaPQ)EBC4441474(DLC) 2016009282(EXLCZ)99371000000060978720160223h20162016 uy| 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrHumour and relevance /Francisco YusAmsterdam ;Philadelphia :John Benjamins Publishing Company,[2016]©20161 online resource (389 p.)Topics in Humor Research (THR),2212-8999 ;4Description based upon print version of record.90-272-6721-9 90-272-0231-1 Includes bibliographical references and indexes.Humour and Relevance; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Dedication page; Table of Contents; Acknowledgement ; Introduction; Relevance theory; 1.1 Introduction: An inferential model of communication; 1.2 Gricean pragmatics; 1.3 Manifestness and cognitive environments; 1.4 Principles and conditions of relevance; 1.5 Comprehension; 1.6 Explicit versus implicated interpretations; 1.7 Social aspects of communication; Relevance theory; 2.1 Introduction: An inferential model of communication; 2.2 Gricean pragmatics; 2.3 Manifestness and cognitive environments2.4 Principles and conditions of relevance2.5 Comprehension; 2.6 Explicit versus implicated interpretations; 2.7 Social aspects of communication; Incongruity-resolution revisited; 3.1 Introduction; 3.2 Background; 3.3 Theories and classifications; 3.3.1 Suls' two-stage model; 3.3.2 Ritchie's forced reinterpretation model; 3.3.3 Dynel's three-fold classification; 3.3.4 Koestler's bisociation theory; 3.3.5 Giora's graded salience hypothesis; 3.3.6 Raskin's SSTH and Attardo and Raskin's GTVH; 3.4 Make-sense frame versus discourse inference; 3.4.1 Frame; 3.4.2 Schema; 3.4.3 Script3.4.4 Make-sense frame3.5 Why is incongruity humorous?; 3.6 Are incongruity and resolution needed?; 3.6.1 Incongruity is sufficient; 3.6.2 Resolution is also necessary; 3.6.3 Incongruity is solved but persists; 3.7 Incongruity-resolution and relevance; 3.8 A new classification of incongruity-resolution patterns; 3.8.1 [frame-based incongruity] [setup] [discourse-based resolution]; 3.8.2 [frame-based incongruity] [punchline] [discourse-based resolution]; 3.8.3 [frame-based incongruity] [setup] [frame-based resolution]; 3.8.4 [frame-based incongruity] [punchline] [frame-based resolution]3.8.5 [frame-based incongruity] [setup] [implication-based resolution]3.8.6 [frame-based incongruity] [punchline] [implication-based resolution]; 3.8.7 [discourse-based incongruity] [setup] [discourse-based resolution]; 3.8.8 [discourse-based incongruity] [punchline] [discourse-based resolution]; 3.8.9 [discourse-based incongruity] [setup] [frame-based resolution]; 3.8.10 [discourse-based incongruity] [punchline] [frame-based resolution]; 3.8.11 [discourse-based incongruity] [setup] [implication-based resolution]; 3.8.12 [discourse-based incongruity] [punchline] [implication-based resolution]The intersecting circles model of humorous communication4.1 Introduction; 4.2 Utterance interpretation as mutual parallel adjustment; 4.3 Make-sense frames and interaction; 4.4 Cultural frames; 4.5 Mind reading and predicted humorous effects; 4.6 Make-sense frames and cultural frames in joke interpretation; 4.7 Towards a new typology of jokes: The Intersecting Circles Model; 4.7.1 Type 1: Make-sense frame + cultural frame + utterance interpretation; 4.7.2 Type 2: Make-sense frame + cultural frame; 4.7.3 Type 3: Make-sense frame + utterance interpretation; 4.7.4 Type 4: Make-sense frame4.7.5 Type 5: Cultural frame + utterance interpretationTopics in humor research ;4.Discourse analysisWit and humorHistory and criticismTheoryRelevancePragmaticsCognitive psychologyPsycholinguisticsDiscourse analysis.Wit and humorHistory and criticismTheory.Relevance.Pragmatics.Cognitive psychology.Psycholinguistics.809.7/00141Yus Francisco591614MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910798285203321Humour and relevance3735157UNINA