01775oam 2200517M 450 991071649710332120200213070909.8(CKB)5470000002521170(OCoLC)1065599674(OCoLC)995470000002521170(EXLCZ)99547000000252117020071213d1927 ua 0engurcn|||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierJoseph Rosen. February 2, 1927. -- Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed[Washington, D.C.] :[U.S. Government Printing Office],1927.1 online resource (2 pages)House report / 69th Congress, 2nd session. House ;no. 1937[United States congressional serial set] ;[serial no. 8690]Batch processed record: Metadata reviewed, not verified. Some fields updated by batch processes.FDLP item number not assigned.ClaimsLost articlesNavy-yards and naval stationsPersonal belongingsSailorsLegislative materials.lcgftClaims.Lost articles.Navy-yards and naval stations.Personal belongings.Sailors.Updike Ralph Eugene1894-1953Republican (IN)1386819WYUWYUOCLCOOCLCQOCLCOOCLCQBOOK9910716497103321Joseph Rosen. February 2, 1927. -- Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed3488927UNINA03493nam 2200541 450 991079800470332120230807211446.092-893-4218-892-893-4219-6(CKB)3710000000605363(EBL)4453393(MiAaPQ)EBC4453393(Au-PeEL)EBL4453393(CaPaEBR)ebr11227857(OCoLC)946552486(EXLCZ)99371000000060536320160714h20152015 uy 0engur|n|---|||||rdacontentrdamediardacarrierClimate benefits of material recycling inventory of average greenhouse gas emissions for Denmark, Norway and Sweden /Karl Hillman [and four others]Copenhagen, [Denmark] :Nordic Council of Ministers,2015.©20151 online resource (87 p.)TemaNord,0908-6692 ;2015:547Description based upon print version of record.92-893-4217-X Includes bibliographical references.Contents; Preface; Summary; Review Statement; Introduction; General Comments; Conclusions; 1. Introduction; 2. Methodology; 2.1 Collaborative stakeholder cooperation; 2.2 Literature review; 2.3 Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); 2.4 System boundaries; 2.4.1 Included materials; 2.4.2 Definition of amounts; 2.4.3 System expansion; 2.4.4 Impact assessment; 3. Investigation context; 3.1 General assumptions; 3.2 Other impact categories; 3.3 Selected studies; 3.3.1 Studies from Norway, Denmark and Sweden; 3.3.2 Studies from other European countries; 3.3.3 Studies from the United States of America4. Investigated materials4.1 Paper and cardboard; 4.2 Glass; 4.3 Plastics; 4.4 Steel; 4.5 Aluminium; 4.6 Organic waste; 4.7 Other metals; 5. Results; 5.1 Paper and cardboard; 5.2 Glass; 5.3 Plastics; 5.4 Steel; 5.5 Aluminium; 5.6 Organic waste; 5.7 Collected results; 6. Discussion; 6.1 Comparison with previous recommendations; 6.2 Impact of energy use and energy mix; Which primary and secondary processes have high energy demand for processing the materials?; How is the relationship between renewable and fossil energy use for different materials?How is the relationship between the use of electricity and fuels for different materials?How to account for the use of waste energy from the processes in, for example, district heating?; 6.3 Geographical differences; 6.4 Quality of materials for secondary production; 6.5 Data availability and uncertainty; 7. Conclusions; 8. Further work; References; Svensk sammanfattning; Appendices; A. Rejected studies; B. Provisional list of materials; C. Reference group; University of Gävle; Technical University of Denmark (DTU); Återvinningsindustrierna (Sweden) and member erpresentativesNorsk Industri & Norsk ReturmetallforeningNordic Council of Ministers; Stiftelsen Gästrikeregionens miljöTemaNord ;2015:547.Climatic changesEconomic aspectsGlobal warmingEconomic aspectsClimatic changesEconomic aspects.Global warmingEconomic aspects.363.73874Hillman KarlMiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910798004703321Climate benefits of material recycling3727739UNINA