03440nam 2200457 450 991079414030332120210224104217.090-04-43577-810.1163/9789004435773(CKB)4100000011287435(OCoLC)1154923073(nllekb)BRILL9789004435773(MiAaPQ)EBC6359697(EXLCZ)99410000001128743520210224d2020 uy 0engurun| uuuuatxtrdacontentcrdamediardacarrierArgument is war relevance-theoretic comprehension of the conceptual metaphor of war in the Apocalypse /by Clifford T. WintersLeiden, The Netherlands ;Boston :Brill,[2020]©20201 online resourceLinguistic biblical studies ;Volume 1890-04-43573-5 Includes bibliographical references and index.List of Figures and Tables -- Abbreviations -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Revelation Has Two Problems -- 1.2 Defining the Problem: “Relevance” -- 1.3 Defining the Problem: “Violence” -- 1.4 How These Problems Relate: “Judgment” -- 2 Methodology -- 2.1 A Long History of Study -- 2.2 Metaphor is Natural to Cognition -- 2.3 Metaphor is Natural to Comprehension -- 2.4 A Model for Combining RT and CMT : Hybrid Theory -- 2.5 Acknowledgment: “Structure” and “Meaning” in Other Disciplines -- 2.6 What This Book is Arguing -- 3 Composing the Conceptual Metaphor ARGUMENT IS WAR -- 3.1 ΣΗΜΑΙΝΩ -- 3.2 Metaphors in Revelation That Look like Daniel 2 -- 3.3 ARGUMENT IS WAR Looks like Daniel 2 -- 4 Elaborating and Completing ARGUMENT IS WAR -- 4.1 The Elaboration of ARGUMENT IS WAR -- 4.2 The Completion of ARGUMENT IS WAR -- 5 The Linguistic Instantiation of ARGUMENT IS WAR -- 5.1 Metalinguistic Signals and Deliberate Metaphors -- 5.2 Linguistic and Semantic Signals Other Than M-Flags -- 6 The Pragmatic Implicature ARGUMENT IS WAR -- 6.1 Ad Hoc Construction -- 6.2 Metarepresentation -- 6.3 Weak Implicatures -- 6.4 Backwards Inference -- 7 Implications and Conclusions -- 7.1 Summary of Evidence for ARGUMENT IS WAR -- 7.2 Summary of Implications -- Bibliography -- Linguistic and Literary Resources -- Biblical and Historical Resources -- Index.In Argument is War: Relevance-Theoretic Comprehension of the Conceptual Metaphor of War in the Apocalypse , Clifford T. Winters demonstrates that the apparent war in the Apocalypse is rather telling the story of the gospel : how Christ will restore Israel and, through them, the rest of the world. When Revelation is viewed through the corrective lens of cognitive linguistics, its violence becomes victory, its violent characters become Christ, and its bloody end becomes the blessed beginning of the New Jerusalem. Revelation is simply telling the story of the early church (the Gospels and Acts) to the early church, and it is using a conceptual metaphor (‘ARGUMENT IS WAR’) to do it.Linguistic biblical studies ;Volume 18.WarBiblical teachingWarBiblical teaching.261.873Winters Clifford1518300MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910794140303321Argument is war3755778UNINA