04026nam 22005292 450 991079317600332120190304110106.0981-4818-64-X10.1355/9789814818643(CKB)4100000005879081(MiAaPQ)EBC5492942(UkCbUP)CR9789814818643(OCoLC)1091646214(MdBmJHUP)muse71638(DE-B1597)522112(OCoLC)1049912756(DE-B1597)9789814818643(EXLCZ)99410000000587908120190108d2019|||| uy| 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierThe "Free and Open Indo-Pacific" and implications for ASEAN /John Lee[electronic resource]Singapore :ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute,2019.1 online resource (34 pages) digital, PDF file(s)Trends in Southeast Asia ;2018 no. 13Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 20 Feb 2019).981-4818-63-1 Includes bibliographical references.Front matter --FOREWORD --The "Free and Open Indo-Pacific" and Implications for ASEAN --The "Free and Open Indo-Pacific" and Implications for ASEAN --CONCLUSIONIn recent times, the United States, Japan and Australia have all promoted extremely similar visions of a Free and Open Indo-Pacific as the central organizing concept to guide their efforts in the region. The concept is essentially a reaffirmation of the security and economic rules-based order which was cobbled together after the Second World War - especially as it relates to freedom of the regional and global commons such as sea, air and cyberspace, and the way nations conduct economic relations. Be that as it may, the Free and Open Indo-Pacific is an updated vision of collective action to defend, strengthen and advance that order. It signals a greater acceptance by the two regional allies of the U.S. of their security burden and takes into account the realities of China's rise and the relative decline in dominance of the U.S. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and its member states continue to delay any definitive response to the Free and Open Indo-Pacific concept. Although its principles are attractive to many ASEAN member states, long-held conceptions of ASEAN centrality and its meaning gives the organization apparent reason for hesitation. The reasons include fears of diminished centrality and relevance, and reluctance to endorse a more confrontational mindset being adopted by the U.S. and its allies - including the revival of the Quadrilateral grouping with India - with respect to China. The reality is that while ASEAN and major member states are focused primarily on the risks of action, there are considerable risks of inaction and hesitation. The current era will either enhance or lessen the relevance of ASEAN in the eyes of these three countries in the years ahead depending on how the organisation and its key member states respond. Indeed, this Trends paper argues that ASEAN is more likely to be left behind by strategic events and developments if it remains passive, and that the ball is in ASEAN's court in terms of the future of its regional 'centrality'.Trends in Southeast Asia ;2018 no. 13.BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / International / EconomicsbisacshIndo-Pacific RegionPolitics and governmentIndo-Pacific RegionForeign relationsSoutheast AsiaSoutheast AsiaForeign relationsIndo-Pacific RegionBUSINESS & ECONOMICS / International / Economics.320.954Lee John364392UkCbUPUkCbUPBOOK9910793176003321The "Free and Open Indo-Pacific" and implications for ASEAN3823469UNINA01160nam0 2200301 i 450 VAN0006139520240806100526.1988-420-5172-120071008d1997 |0itac50 baitaIT|||| |||||Introduzione alla teoria della crescita endogenaIgnazio Musu, Guido CazzavillanRoma [etc.] : Laterza1997XV169 p. ; 21 cmSegue: Appendice matematica.Sviluppo economicoModelli matematiciVANC011699FIRomaVANL000360339.5Politica macroeconomica21MusuIgnazioVANV006596437571CazzavillanGuidoVANV048450124314Laterza <editore>VANV107871650ITSOL20240906RICABIBLIOTECA DEL DIPARTIMENTO DI ECONOMIAIT-CE0106VAN03VAN00061395BIBLIOTECA DEL DIPARTIMENTO DI ECONOMIA03CONS IIIAa33 03 7938 20071008 Introduzione alla teoria della crescita endogena1128554UNICAMPANIA