02713nam 2200661Ia 450 991079226470332120200520144314.00-19-988824-80-19-533976-21-281-98069-20-19-970675-19786611980696(CKB)2560000000294005(SSID)ssj0000087390(PQKBManifestationID)11384692(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000087390(PQKBWorkID)10053154(PQKB)11180785(StDuBDS)EDZ0000073719(MiAaPQ)EBC3053064(Au-PeEL)EBL3053064(CaPaEBR)ebr10282182(CaONFJC)MIL198069(OCoLC)316006042(EXLCZ)99256000000029400520080123d2008 uy 0engur|||||||||||txtccrHow the Chicago School overshot the mark[electronic resource] the effect of conservative economic analysis on U.S. antitrust /edited by Robert PitofskyOxford ;New York Oxford University Press20081 online resource (xiv, 309 p.)Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph0-19-537282-4 0-19-987177-9 Includes bibliographical references and index.Conservative economic analysis and its effects -- Is efficiency all that counts? -- Chicago School and dominant firm behavior -- Can vertical arrangements injure consumer welfare? -- Has the free rider explanation for vertical arrangements been unrealistically expanded? -- Reinvigorating merger enforcement that has declined as a result of conservative economic analysis.The essays collected in this book concern the rise and recent fall of American antitrust. Of the 15 essays, almost all express a deep concern that conservative economic analysis is leading judges and enforcement officials toward an approach that will ultimately harm consumer welfare.Antitrust lawEconomic aspectsUnited StatesAntitrust lawUnited StatesCompetitionUnited StatesIndustrial concentrationUnited StatesAntitrust lawEconomic aspectsAntitrust lawCompetitionIndustrial concentration343.73/072183.32bclPitofsky Robert1117151MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910792264703321How the Chicago School overshot the mark3671146UNINA