04111nam 22007812 450 991079186100332120220412134839.00-511-86177-X1-107-21925-61-283-00613-897866130061340-511-86022-60-511-86109-50-511-85848-50-511-85761-60-511-78165-20-511-85935-X(CKB)2560000000059719(EBL)615771(OCoLC)703137556(SSID)ssj0000472769(PQKBManifestationID)11325187(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000472769(PQKBWorkID)10436149(PQKB)11233467(UkCbUP)CR9780511781650(MiAaPQ)EBC615771(Au-PeEL)EBL615771(CaPaEBR)ebr10449290(CaONFJC)MIL300613(EXLCZ)99256000000005971920100519d2011|||| uy| 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierRethinking the judicial settlement of Reconstruction /Pamela Brandwein[electronic resource]Cambridge :Cambridge University Press,2011.1 online resource (xi, 269 pages) digital, PDF file(s)Cambridge studies on the American ConstitutionTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).1-107-62591-2 0-521-88771-2 Includes bibliographical references and index.Abandoned Blacks? -- The emergence of the concept of state neglect, 1867-1873 -- The civil/social distinction : an intramural Republican dispute -- The birth of state action doctrine, 1874-1876 -- A surviving sectional context, 1876-1891 -- The Civil Rights Cases and the language of state neglect -- Definitive judicial abandonment, 1896-1906 -- Twentieth-century receptions -- Conclusion.American constitutional lawyers and legal historians routinely assert that the Supreme Court's state action doctrine halted Reconstruction in its tracks. But it didn't. Rethinking the Judicial Settlement of Reconstruction demolishes the conventional wisdom - and puts a constructive alternative in its place. Pamela Brandwein unveils a lost jurisprudence of rights that provided expansive possibilities for protecting blacks' physical safety and electoral participation, even as it left public accommodation rights undefended. She shows that the Supreme Court supported a Republican coalition and left open ample room for executive and legislative action. Blacks were abandoned, but by the president and Congress, not the Court. Brandwein unites close legal reading of judicial opinions (some hitherto unknown), sustained historical work, the study of political institutions, and the sociology of knowledge. This book explodes tired old debates and will provoke new ones.Cambridge studies on the American Constitution.Civil rightsUnited StatesStatesHistoryBlack peopleLegal status, laws, etcUnited StatesStatesHistoryDiscriminationLaw and legislationUnited StatesStatesHistoryCivil rightsUnited StatesHistoryDiscriminationLaw and legislationUnited StatesHistoryReconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877)Civil rightsStatesHistory.Black peopleLegal status, laws, etc.StatesHistory.DiscriminationLaw and legislationStatesHistory.Civil rightsHistory.DiscriminationLaw and legislationHistory.Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877)342.7308/73Brandwein Pamela1505122UkCbUPUkCbUPBOOK9910791861003321Rethinking the judicial settlement of Reconstruction3734564UNINA