03440nam 22007333u 450 991045293380332120210108153649.01-55844-276-6(CKB)2550000001040409(EBL)3327987(SSID)ssj0000827053(PQKBManifestationID)12338741(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000827053(PQKBWorkID)10819925(PQKB)11425834(MiAaPQ)EBC3327987(EXLCZ)99255000000104040920151005d2014|||| u|| |engur|n|---|||||txtccrValue Capture and Land Policies[electronic resource]Cambridge Lincoln Institute of Land Policy20141 online resource (482 p.)Land Policy SeriesDescription based upon print version of record.1-55844-227-8 ""CONTENTS""; ""ILLUSTRATIONS""; ""1 Land Value Capture: Types and Outcomes""; ""2 Land Value Capture and Justice""; ""3 Takings and Givings: The Analytics of Land Value Capture and Its Symmetries with Takings Compensation""; ""4 The Unearned Increment: Property and the Capture of Betterment Value in Britain and France""; ""5 Special Assessments in California: 35 Years of Expansion and Restriction""; ""6 Collecting Land Value Through Public Land Leasing""; ""7 A Better Way to Grow?: Town Planning Schemes as a Hybrid Land Readjustment Process in Ahmedabad, India""""8 Are Property-Related Taxes Effective Value Capture Instruments?""""9 Community Benefits Agreements in a Value Capture Context""; ""10 Science Parks and Land Value Capture""; ""11 The Affordability Challenge: Inclusionary Housing and Community Land Trusts in a Federal System""; ""12 Transit Value Capture: New Town Codevelopment Models and Land Market Updates in Tokyo and Hong Kong""; ""13 Airport Improvement Fees, Benefit Spillovers, and Land Value Capture Mechanisms""; ""14 Assessing the Nonprofit Property Tax Exemption: Should Nonprofit Entities Be Taxed for Using Local Public Goods?""""15 Experimenting with Land Value Capture on Western State Trust Land""""CONTRIBUTORS""; ""INDEX""Land Policy SeriesLand use, UrbanPublic investmentsPublic lands -- ValuationReal estate development -- FinancePublic landsValuationReal estate developmentFinanceLand use, UrbanPublic investmentsBusiness & EconomicsHILCCReal Estate, Housing & Land UseHILCCElectronic books.Land use, Urban.Public investments.Public lands -- Valuation.Real estate development -- Finance.Public landsValuationReal estate developmentFinanceLand use, UrbanPublic investmentsBusiness & EconomicsReal Estate, Housing & Land Use333.10973Ingram Gregory K261849Hong Yu-Hung869255AU-PeELAU-PeELAU-PeELBOOK9910452933803321Value Capture and Land Policies2140765UNINA05566nam 2200685 450 991079054860332120230803021735.090-272-7147-X(CKB)2550000001117338(EBL)1394968(SSID)ssj0001127068(PQKBManifestationID)11625655(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001127068(PQKBWorkID)11137047(PQKB)10320400(MiAaPQ)EBC1394968(Au-PeEL)EBL1394968(CaPaEBR)ebr10767249(CaONFJC)MIL517776(OCoLC)858653862(EXLCZ)99255000000111733820131008h20132013 uy| 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrPapers from the 2011 Lund conference /edited by Johan Brandtler, Valéria Molnár, Christer Platzack, Lund UniversityAmsterdam :John Benjamins Publishing Company,[2013]©20131 online resource (260 p.)Approaches to Hungarian,1878-7916 ;volume 13Description based upon print version of record.90-272-0483-7 1-299-86525-9 Includes bibliographical references and index.Approaches to Hungarian; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Introduction; References; Reanalysis in Hungarian comparative subclauses; 1. Introduction; 2. The structure of the left periphery in comparative subclauses; 3. Parametric variation concerning Comparative Deletion; 4. Diachronic change in Hungarian - an overview; 5. Reanalysis and parametric change; 5.1 The initial setup; 5.2 The relation of "hogy" and "hogy nem"; 5.3 The relative cycle as a grammaticalization process; 5.4 The appearance of "mint"; 5.5 The reanalysis of "mint"5.6 Reanalysis in terms of the two C heads Conclusion; References; Codices; Silent people; 1. Introduction; 2. Some problems of the universal impersonal cum adverbial construction; 3. A shift of perspective; 4. Some problems solved; 5. Stage vs individual level modifiers; References; Clausal Coordinate Ellipsis (CCE) in Hungarian compared to CCE in Dutch, German, and Estonian; 1. Introduction; 2. Definition of the CCE rules; 3. Accuracy of the CCE rules in Hungarian; 3.1 Summary of results for Dutch, Estonian and German CCE; 3.2 Construction of ELLEIPO-INPUT-HU and its evaluation4. Conclusions Acknowledgement; References; Pseudoclefts in Hungarian; 1. Introduction; 2. The phenomenon; 2.1 Types of Pseudoclefts; 2.2 Connectivity Effects; 3. Previous approaches; 3.1 The 'question-plus-deletion' (QPD) approach; 3.2 The 'What-you-see-is-what-you-get' (WYSIWIG) approach; 4. A WYSIWYG analysis of Hungarian specificational pseudoclefts; 4.1 Hungarian clause structure; 4.2 Proposal; 4.3 Hungarian copular clauses and information structure; 4.4 Evidence for the subjecthood of the pivot; 4.5 The nature and role of the wh-clause5. (Anti-)Connectivity in Hungarian specificational pseudoclefts 5.1 Connectivity effects; 5.2 Connectivity Effects in a WYSIWYG approach; 5.3 Anti-connectivity effects; 6. A comparison of QPD and WYSIWYG accounts; 7. Conclusion; References; Focus, exhaustivity and the syntax of Wh-interrogatives; 1. Introduction; 2. Interrogative wh-phrases and the syntax of "Focus": Previous accounts; 2.1 Wh-questions: Movements and landing sites; 2.2 Syntactic parallels between "Focus" and Wh-interrogatives in Hungarian; 2.3 A [Focus]-feature based account of overt wh-movement: Lipták (2001)3. Eliminating [Focus] from the syntax: movement and an Exhaustivity operator 3.1 Separating "Focus-movement" from Focus; 3.2 A syntactic Exhaustivity operator: The EI-Op movement account; 3.3 Possible overt evidence for EI-Op and a clausal EI head: Exclusive csak 'only'; 4. The role of C0 vs. EI0 in wh-questions: Movement and interpretation; 4.1 An Agree relation between C0 and the preposed wh-phrase; 4.2 Divergence between interrogative wh versus non-wh phrases moved to "pre-V" position; 5. EI-Op phrase and wh-interrogative preposing in the same clause?; Acknowledgments; ReferencesA phi-agreement constraint on subject extraction in FinnishMandatory phrasal prominence on a constituent in English is often attributed to the presence of a focus interpretation for that constituent, be it focus as discourse new or as selection among discourse relevant alternatives. It is argued here that these two functions of focus should be empirically distinguished and use of the notion "focus" restricted to the latter function alone. Phrasal prosodic prominence in discourse new constituents is attributed to default prosody, namely the focus-insensitive mapping between syntactic and prosodic structures. Evidence is garnered to support the notionApproaches to Hungarian ;v. 13.Hungarian languageGrammarHungarian languageGrammarCongressesHungarian languageGrammar.Hungarian languageGrammar494.5115494/.5115Brandtler Johan1497431Molnár Valéria1465901Platzack Christer1943-929428MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910790548603321Papers from the 2011 Lund conference3722525UNINA