02661nam 2200541Ia 450 991079024440332120230725033403.00-87609-486-8(CKB)2670000000185688(OCoLC)535663161(CaPaEBR)ebrary10554826(SSID)ssj0000645916(PQKBManifestationID)11370577(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000645916(PQKBWorkID)10685501(PQKB)11117103(MiAaPQ)EBC3137481(Au-PeEL)EBL3137481(CaPaEBR)ebr10554826(OCoLC)922997897(EXLCZ)99267000000018568820100823d2010 uy 0engurcn|||||||||txtccrThe future of NATO /James M. GoldgeierNew York Council on Foreign Relations20101 online resource (ix, 33 pages)Council special report ;no. 51"February 2010".0-87609-467-1 Includes bibliographical references.Introduction NATO's purpose : collective defense in the twenty-first century Beyond Europe NATO and Russia NATO capabilities NATO and the EU ConclusionsTakes on the question of how NATO, having successfully kept the peace in Europe in the twentieth century, can adapt to the challenges of the twenty-first. Contends that NATO retains value for the United States and Europe, but that it must expand its vision of collective defense in order to remain relevant and effective. This means recognizing the full range of threats that confront NATO members today and affirming that the alliance will respond collectively to an act (whether by an outside state or a nonstate entity) that imperils the political or economic security or territorial integrity of a member state. NATO has been a cornerstone of security in Europe, and of U.S. foreign policy, for six decades. But its ability to continue playing such a central role is unclear. This report takes a sober look at what the alliance and its members must do to maintain NATO's relevance in the face of today's strategic environment.Security, InternationalSecurity, International.355.031091821Goldgeier James M1502253Council on Foreign Relations.International Institutions and Global Governance Program.MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910790244403321The future of NATO3794527UNINA