03743nam 22007212 450 991078998270332120151005020622.01-107-22093-91-139-06378-21-139-08300-71-139-08073-31-283-11305-81-139-07617-50-511-78303-597866131130541-139-07044-41-139-07846-1(CKB)2670000000092275(EBL)691954(OCoLC)727649224(SSID)ssj0000522104(PQKBManifestationID)11381413(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000522104(PQKBWorkID)10527869(PQKB)10604874(UkCbUP)CR9780511783036(Au-PeEL)EBL691954(CaPaEBR)ebr10470729(CaONFJC)MIL311305(MiAaPQ)EBC691954(EXLCZ)99267000000009227520100526d2011|||| uy| 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierDomestic law goes global legal traditions and international courts /Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, Emilia Justyna Powell[electronic resource]Cambridge :Cambridge University Press,2011.1 online resource (xiv, 263 pages) digital, PDF file(s)Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).1-107-66167-6 1-107-00416-0 Includes bibliographical references and index.The creation and expansion of international courts -- Major legal traditions of the world -- A rational legal design theory of international adjudication -- Domestic legal traditions and the creation of the International Criminal Court -- Domestic legal traditions and state support for the World Court -- The rational design of state commitments to international courts -- The consequences of support for international courts -- Conclusion.International courts have proliferated in the international system, with over one hundred judicial or quasi-judicial bodies in existence today. This book develops a rational legal design theory of international adjudication in order to explain the variation in state support for international courts. Initial negotiators of new courts, 'originators', design international courts in ways that are politically and legally optimal. States joining existing international courts, 'joiners', look to the legal rules and procedures to assess the courts' ability to be capable, fair and unbiased. The authors demonstrate that the characteristics of civil law, common law and Islamic law influence states' acceptance of the jurisdiction of international courts, the durability of states' commitments to international courts, and the design of states' commitments to the courts. Furthermore, states strike cooperative agreements most effectively in the shadow of an international court that operates according to familiar legal principles and rules.International courtsInternational lawSourcesInternational and municipal lawInternational law National law influencesInternational courts.International lawInternational and municipal law.341.5/5POL011000bisacshMitchell Sara McLaughlin609922Powell Emilia JustynaUkCbUPUkCbUPBOOK9910789982703321Domestic law goes global3706273UNINA