04084nam 2200745 450 991078676130332120210512234014.00-8014-5515-40-8014-5516-210.7591/9780801455162(CKB)3710000000216344(OCoLC)886740418(CaPaEBR)ebrary10902227(SSID)ssj0001290241(PQKBManifestationID)11734458(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001290241(PQKBWorkID)11234609(PQKB)11003672(StDuBDS)EDZ0001510199(MiAaPQ)EBC3138620(OCoLC)1080551511(MdBmJHUP)muse58335(DE-B1597)478222(OCoLC)979723451(DE-B1597)9780801455162(Au-PeEL)EBL3138620(CaPaEBR)ebr10902227(CaONFJC)MIL681337(EXLCZ)99371000000021634420140813h20142014 uy 0engur|||||||||||txtccrAmerican biodefense how dangerous ideas about biological weapons shape national security /Frank L. Smith IIIIthaca, New York :Cornell University Press,2014.©20141 online resource (205 p.)Cornell Studies in Security AffairsIncludes index.1-322-50055-X 0-8014-5271-6 Includes bibliographical references and index.Front matter --Contents --Acknowledgments --Acronyms --American Biodefense, from Boston to Baghdad --1. Science and Technology for National Security --2. Stereotypical Neglect of Military Research, Development, and Acquisition for Biodefense --3. Fatal Assumptions --4. An Unlikely Sponsor? --Biodefense and Beyond --Notes --IndexBiological weapons have threatened U.S. national security since at least World War II. Historically, however, the U.S. military has neglected research, development, acquisition, and doctrine for biodefense. Following September 11 and the anthrax letters of 2001, the United States started spending billions of dollars per year on medical countermeasures and biological detection systems. But most of this funding now comes from the Department of Health and Human Services rather than the Department of Defense. Why has the U.S. military neglected biodefense and allowed civilian organizations to take the lead in defending the country against biological attacks? In American Biodefense, Frank L. Smith III addresses this puzzling and largely untold story about science, technology, and national security. Smith argues that organizational frames and stereotypes have caused both military neglect and the rise of civilian biodefense. In the armed services, influential ideas about kinetic warfare have undermined defense against biological warfare. The influence of these ideas on science and technology challenges the conventional wisdom that national security policy is driven by threats or bureaucratic interests. Given the ideas at work inside the U.S. military, Smith explains how the lessons learned from biodefense can help solve other important problems that range from radiation weapons to cyber attacks.Cornell studies in security affairs.Biological warfareUnited StatesSafety measuresBiosecurityUnited StatesNational securityUnited StatesCivil defenseUnited Statesbioterrorism, biological warfare, weapons of mass destruction, kinetic warfare.Biological warfareSafety measures.BiosecurityNational securityCivil defense358/.384Smith Frank L.III,1978-1549103MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910786761303321American biodefense3806713UNINA