04256nam 2200733 a 450 991078567460332120220416004229.01-282-96470-497866129647011-4008-3754-510.1515/9781400837540(CKB)2670000000067542(EBL)646777(OCoLC)701704293(SSID)ssj0000474447(PQKBManifestationID)11296611(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000474447(PQKBWorkID)10454126(PQKB)10627517(OCoLC)703155994(MdBmJHUP)muse36885(DE-B1597)446768(OCoLC)1054881717(OCoLC)979623961(DE-B1597)9781400837540(Au-PeEL)EBL646777(CaPaEBR)ebr10442045(CaONFJC)MIL296470(MiAaPQ)EBC646777(EXLCZ)99267000000006754220070523d2007 uy 0engurnn#---|u||utxtccrWhy is there no labor party in the United States?[electronic resource] /Robin ArcherCourse BookPrinceton Princeton University Pressc20071 online resource (369 p.)Princeton studies in American politicsDescription based upon print version of record.0-691-12701-8 0-691-14934-8 Includes bibliographical references and index.Front matter --Contents --List of Figures --List of Tables --List of Abbreviations --Acknowledgments --Introduction --CHAPTER 1. Workers --CHAPTER 2. Race --CHAPTER 3. Elections and the Constitution --CHAPTER 4. The Courts --CHAPTER 5. Repression --CHAPTER 6. Liberalism --CHAPTER 7. Religion --CHAPTER 8. Socialism --Conclusion --Appendix: Notes and Sources for the Tables --Notes --Bibliography --Index --BackmatterWhy is the United States the only advanced capitalist country with no labor party? This question is one of the great enduring puzzles of American political development, and it lies at the heart of a fundamental debate about the nature of American society. Tackling this debate head-on, Robin Archer puts forward a new explanation for why there is no American labor party--an explanation that suggests that much of the conventional wisdom about "American exceptionalism" is untenable. Conventional explanations rely on comparison with Europe. Archer challenges these explanations by comparing the United States with its most similar New World counterpart--Australia. This comparison is particularly revealing, not only because the United States and Australia share many fundamental historical, political, and social characteristics, but also because Australian unions established a labor party in the late nineteenth century, just when American unions, against a common backdrop of industrial defeat and depression, came closest to doing something similar. Archer examines each of the factors that could help explain the American outcome, and his systematic comparison yields unexpected conclusions. He argues that prosperity, democracy, liberalism, and racial hostility often promoted the very changes they are said to have obstructed. And he shows that it was not these characteristics that left the United States without a labor party, but, rather, the powerful impact of repression, religion, and political sectarianism.Princeton studies in American politics.Labor unionsPolitical activityUnited StatesHistoryLabor unionsPolitical activityAustraliaHistoryPolitical sociologyLabor unionsPolitical activityHistory.Labor unionsPolitical activityHistory.Political sociology.322/.20973MG 70260rvkArcher Robin253597MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910785674603321Why is there no labor party in the United States3761649UNINA