04064nam 22007095 450 991078555650332120230126205705.00-8147-6976-40-8147-3899-010.18574/9780814738993(CKB)2670000000234189(EBL)1002908(OCoLC)809846968(SSID)ssj0000739759(PQKBManifestationID)11473224(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000739759(PQKBWorkID)10687998(PQKB)10800014(StDuBDS)EDZ0001326215(MiAaPQ)EBC1002908(MdBmJHUP)muse19216(DE-B1597)547247(DE-B1597)9780814738993(EXLCZ)99267000000023418920200608h20122012 fg 0engurnn#---|u||utxtccrVisualizing atrocity Arendt, evil, and the optics of thoughtlessness /Valerie HartouniNew York :New York University Press,[2012]©20121 online resource (208 p.)Critical Cultural Communication ;3Description based upon print version of record.0-8147-7183-1 0-8147-3849-4 Includes bibliographical references and index.Front matter --Contents --Acknowledgments --Introduction --1. Arendt and the Trial of Adolf Eichmann --2. Ideology and Atrocity --3. Thoughtlessness and Evil --4. “Crimes against the Human Status” Nuremberg and the Image of Evil --5. The Banality of Evil --Notes --Bibliography --Index --About the AuthorVisualizing Atrocity takes Hannah Arendt’s provocative and polarizing account of the 1961 trial of Nazi official Adolf Eichmann as its point of departure for reassessing some of the serviceable myths that have come to shape and limit our understanding both of the Nazi genocide and totalitarianism’s broader, constitutive, and recurrent features. These myths are inextricably tied to and reinforced viscerally by the atrocity imagery that emerged with the liberation of the concentration camps at the war’s end and played an especially important, evidentiary role in the postwar trials of perpetrators. At the 1945 Nuremberg Tribunal, particular practices of looking and seeing were first established with respect to these images that were later reinforced and institutionalized through Eichmann’s trial in Jerusalem as simply part of the fabric of historical fact. They have come to constitute a certain visual rhetoric that now circumscribes the moral and political fields and powerfully assists in contemporary mythmaking about how we know genocide and what is permitted to count as such. In contrast, Arendt’s claims about the “banality of evil” work to disrupt this visual rhetoric. More significantly still, they direct our attention well beyond the figure of Eichmann to a world organized now as then by practices and processes that while designed to sustain and even enhance life work as well to efface it.Critical Cultural CommunicationGood and evilSocial aspectsGood and evilPolitical aspectsGenocideGermanyHistory20th centuryWorld War, 1939-1945AtrocitiesGermanyHolocaust, Jewish (1939-1945)War crime trialsJerusalemHistory20th centuryGood and evilSocial aspects.Good and evilPolitical aspects.GenocideHistoryWorld War, 1939-1945AtrocitiesHolocaust, Jewish (1939-1945)War crime trialsHistory940.5318092Hartouni Valerieauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut1498225DE-B1597DE-B1597BOOK9910785556503321Visualizing atrocity3737583UNINA