03839nam 2200697Ia 450 991078529930332120230725024714.00-292-79276-X10.7560/721975(CKB)2670000000039093(OCoLC)649473789(CaPaEBR)ebrary10392320(SSID)ssj0000423653(PQKBManifestationID)11270531(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000423653(PQKBWorkID)10441208(PQKB)11535010(MiAaPQ)EBC3443486(MdBmJHUP)muse2438(Au-PeEL)EBL3443486(CaPaEBR)ebr10392320(DE-B1597)588075(OCoLC)1286808838(DE-B1597)9780292792760(EXLCZ)99267000000003909320090806d2010 ub 0engurcn|||||||||txtccrMuslim reformers in Iran and Turkey[electronic resource] the paradox of moderation /Güneş Murat Tezcür1st ed.Austin University of Texas Press20101 online resource (321 p.)Modern Middle East series ;no. 25Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph0-292-72197-8 Includes bibliographical references and index.From Islamists to Muslim reformers : a theory of political change -- Muslim reformism in comparative perspective -- Muslim reformism : engagement with secularism and liberal democracy -- The guardians and elections in Iran and Turkey -- A moment of enthusiasm in the Islamic Republic -- Elusive democratization in the secular republic -- A tale of two elections.Moderation theory describes the process through which radical political actors develop commitments to electoral competition, political pluralism, human rights, and rule of law and come to prefer negotiation, reconciliation, and electoral politics over provocation, confrontation, and contentious action. Revisiting this theory through an examination of two of the most prominent moderate Islamic political forces in recent history, Muslim Reformers in Iran and Turkey analyzes the gains made and methods implemented by the Reform Front in the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Justice and Development Party in Turkey. Both of these groups represent Muslim reformers who came into continual conflict with unelected adversaries who attempted to block their reformist agendas. Based on extensive field research in both locales, Muslim Reformers in Iran and Turkey argues that behavioral moderation as practiced by these groups may actually inhibit democratic progress. Political scientist Güneş Murat Tezcür observes that the ability to implement conciliatory tactics, organize electoral parties, and make political compromises impeded democracy when pursued by the Reform Front and the Justice and Development Party. Challenging conventional wisdom, Tezcür's findings have broad implications for the dynamics of democratic progress.Modern Middle East series (Austin, Tex.) ;no. 25.Islam and politicsIranIslam and politicsTurkeyLiberalismIranLiberalismTurkeyIranPolitics and government1997-TurkeyPolitics and government1980-Islam and politicsIslam and politicsLiberalismLiberalism322/.10955Tezcür Güneş Murat1979-1467899MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910785299303321Muslim reformers in Iran and Turkey3678779UNINA