02607nam 2200589Ia 450 991078473950332120230331005425.01-280-44054-60-19-536365-51-4237-6378-5(CKB)1000000000404878(EBL)271195(OCoLC)191924787(SSID)ssj0000124268(PQKBManifestationID)11134093(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000124268(PQKBWorkID)10016915(PQKB)11034209(MiAaPQ)EBC271195(Au-PeEL)EBL271195(CaPaEBR)ebr10142145(CaONFJC)MIL44054(OCoLC)936850361(EXLCZ)99100000000040487819860818d1988 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrCogitations[electronic resource] a study of the cogito in relation to the philosophy of logic and language and a study of them in relation to the cogito /Jerrold J. KatzNew York Oxford University Press19881 online resource (217 p.)Description based upon print version of record.0-19-505550-0 Includes bibliography: p. [186]-198 and index.Contents; I. Introduction; II. The Cartesian Scholar's Dilemma; III. The Source of the Obscurity; IV. Logical Form, Universality, Linguisticism, and Locke; V. How the Concept Containment Notion of Analyticity was Lost; VI. Regaining the Concept Containment Notion of Analyticity; VII. The Analytic Entailment of Existential Sentences; VIII. The Cogito as an Analytic Entailment; IX. Cartesian Scholarship Revisited; X. The Nature of Analysis; XI. The Cogito and Indubitability; XII. On the Existence of a Thinker; XIII. A Brief Revisionist History of Analyticity; Notes; Index; A; B; C; D; E; F; GHI; J; K; L; M; N; O; P; Q; R; S; T; U; V; WDescartes's Cogito ergo sum is one of the best-known of all philosophical formulations, but many philosophers have found it problematic. Katz proposes that the ""Cogito"" should be understood as an example of ""analytical entailment"".Analysis (Philosophy)Language and logicAnalysis (Philosophy)Language and logic.111Katz Jerrold J131942MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910784739503321Cogitations469547UNINA