05485nam 2200673 a 450 991078390110332120230617005759.01-136-97671-X1-280-30859-197866103085900-203-49513-6(CKB)1000000000248379(EBL)200852(OCoLC)437061846(SSID)ssj0000357641(PQKBManifestationID)11263411(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000357641(PQKBWorkID)10359516(PQKB)10714880(MiAaPQ)EBC200852(Au-PeEL)EBL200852(CaPaEBR)ebr10162518(CaONFJC)MIL761278(EXLCZ)99100000000024837920040316d2003 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrCauses and consequences of word structure[electronic resource] /by Jennifer HayNew York Routledge20031 online resource (257 p.)Outstanding dissertations in linguisticsOriginally presented as author's thesis (Ph. D.)--Northwestern University, 2000.0-415-86140-3 0-415-96788-0 Includes bibliographical references (p. 219-232) and index.Cover; Causes and Consequences of word Structure; Copyright; Contents; List of Figures; List of Tables; Preface; Acknowledgments; 1. Introduction; 1.1 Modeling Speech Perception; 1.2 Modeling Morphological Processing; 1.3 Lexical Effects; 1.3.1 Phonological Transparency; 1.3.2 Temporality; 1.3.3 Relative Frequency; 1.4 Prelexical Effects; 1.4.1 Metrical Structure; 1.4.2 Possible Word Constraint; 1.4.3 Probabilistic Phonotactics; 1.5 Consequences; 1.5.1 Words; 1.5.2 Affixes; 1.6 Some Disclaimers; 1.7 Organization of the Book; 2. Phonotactics and Morphology in Speech Perception2.1 Phonotactics in Speech Perception2.2 Neural Networks and Segmentation; 2.3 Experiment 1: a Simple Recurrent Network; 2.3.1 Network Architecture; 2.3.2 Training Data; 2.3.3 Results and Discussion; 2.4 Phonotactics and Morphological Decomposition; 2.5 Experiment 2: Phonotactic Decomposition in Morphology; 2.5.1 Materials; 2.5.2 Methodology; 2.5.3 Results and Discussion; 2.6 Summary; 3. Phonotactics and the Lexicon; 3.1 Experiment 3: Phonotactics and Morphological Complexity; 3.1.1 Materials and Methodology; 3.1.2 Results and Discussion; 3.2 Calculating Juncturehood; 3.3 Prefixes3.3.1 Prefixedness3.3.2 Semantics; Semantic Transparency Ratings: Wurm (1997); Polysemy; Degree of Semantic Drift; 3.3.3 Lexical Frequency; 3.4 Suffixes; 3.4.1 Semantics; Degree of Semantic Drift; Polysemy; 3.4.2 Lexical Frequency; 3.4.3 Summary: Suffixes and Junctural Phonotactics; 3.5 Summary; 4. Relative Frequency and Morphological Decomposition; 4.1 Relative Frequency in Morphology; 4.2 Surface Frequency and Decomposition; 4.3 Base Frequency and Decomposition; 4.4 Models of Morphological Processing; 4.4.1 Bybee's ""morphology as Connections"" Model4.4.2 Caramazza's ""augmented Addressed Morphology""4.4.3 Marslen-wilson's ""direct Access Model""; 4.4.4 Baayen(1992); 4.4.5 Frauenfelder and Schreuder (1992); 4.4.6 Schreuder and Baayen's Morphological Meta-model; 4.4.7 Summary; 4.5 Experiment 4: Relative Frequency and Morphological Complexity; 4.5.1 Materials and Methodology; 4.5.2 Results and Discussion; 4.6 Experiment 5: Relative Frequency and Pitch Accent Placement; 4.6.1 Materials and Methodology; 4.6.2 Results; 4.6.3 Discussion; 4.7 Summary; 5. Relative Frequency and the Lexicon; 5.1 Relative Frequency Distributions in Affixed Words5.2 Relative Frequency in Prefixed Forms5.2.1 Relative Frequency and Polysemy in Prefixed Forms; 5.2.2 Relative Frequency and Semantic Drift of Prefixed Forms; 5.3 Relative Frequency in Suffixed Forms; 5.3.1 Relative Frequency and Semantic Drift in Suffixed Forms; 5.3.2 Relative Frequency and Polysemy in Suffixed Forms; 5.4 Summary; 5.5 Consequences; 6. Relative Frequency and Phonetic Implementation; 6.1 Experiment 6: Relative Frequency and /tadeletion; 6.1.1 Materials; 6.1.2 Measurement and Analysis; 6.1.3 Results and Discussion; 6.2 Discussion; 7. Morphological Productivity7.1 Measuring ProductivityThis book explores the effect of speech perception strategies upon morphological structure. Using connectionist modelling, perception and production experiments, and calculations over lexical, Jennifer Hay investigates the role of two factors known to be relevant to speech perceptions: phonotactics and lexical frequency.Hay demonstrates that low-probability phoneme transitions across morpheme boundaries exert a considerable force toward the maintenance of complex words, and argues that the relative frequency of the derived form and the base significantly affects the decomposability of compOutstanding dissertations in linguistics.Grammar, Comparative and generalMorphologySpeech perceptionGrammar, Comparative and generalMorphology.Speech perception.415Hay Jennifer291443MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910783901103321Causes and consequences of word structure3828427UNINA