00981cam0 2200289 450 E60020003856020211027091830.020080710d1989 |||||ita|0103 baitaITEffi BriestTheodor Fontaneintr. Giuseppe Bevilacquatrad. Erich Linder6 ed.MilanoGarzanti1989XXVI270 p. ; 18 cm<I >grandi libri Garzanti001LAEC000156972001 I *grandi libri GarzantiFontane, TheodorA600200030849070131693Bevilacqua, GiuseppeAF00014401070ITUNISOB20211027RICAUNISOBUNISOB830|Coll|10|K67293E600200038560M 102 Monografia moderna SBNM830|Coll|10|K000003SI67293acquistopregresso1UNISOBUNISOB20080710072950.020211027091802.0SpinosaEffi Briest99815UNISOB03815nam 2200589Ia 450 991078379440332120231206211711.01-282-86060-797866128606070-7735-7037-310.1515/9780773570375(CKB)1000000000244856(SSID)ssj0000277785(PQKBManifestationID)11195763(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000277785(PQKBWorkID)10240772(PQKB)10592876(CaPaEBR)400040(CaBNvSL)jme00318181(VaAlCD)20.500.12592/hn4k2x(MiAaPQ)EBC3330720(DE-B1597)655101(DE-B1597)9780773570375(MiAaPQ)EBC3243589(EXLCZ)99100000000024485620011217d2002 uy 0engurcn|||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierCharter conflicts what is Parliament's role? /Janet L. HiebertMontreal McGill-Queen's University Press20021 online resource (304 pages)Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph0-7735-2399-5 Includes bibliographical references and index.Front Matter -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- Political Scrutiny of Charter Conflicts -- The Legitimacy Debate -- A Relational Approach to Charter Judgments -- Tobacco Advertising -- Sexual Assault Trials -- Regulating the Collection and Uses of DNA -- The Rules and Exemptions for Search Warrants -- Equality Claims of Lesbians and Gay Men -- Assessing the Charter’s Influence -- Conclusion -- Notes -- IndexAlthough the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is twenty years old, little is known about how it affects those who wield power, what influence it has on legislative decisions, or to what extent the government believes it should be constrained by Charter concerns. For most laws Parliament has the final word on how social policy is balanced against protected rights. Thus the extent to which legislation is sensitive towards rights depends on how those who develop, propose, and assess policy view the Charter. How influential are governmental legal advisors? How risk averse or risk tolerant are government ministers when pursuing legislative goals that may result in Charter challenges? How capable is Parliament in requiring government to justify and explain legislative choices that may impair rights? In Charter Conflicts Janet Hiebert examines these questions while analyzing the Charter's influence on controversial legislative decisions such as social benefits for lesbians and gay men, the regulation of tobacco advertising, the rules of evidence for sexual assault trials, the use of DNA for law enforcement purposes, and the rules for police searches of private residences. She questions the broadly held assumption that only courts are capable of respecting rights, arguing that Parliament shares responsibility with the judiciary for resolving Charter conflicts. She views the Charter's significance less in terms of the judiciary overruling Parliament than in the incentives and pressures it provides for public and political officials to satisfy themselves that legislation is consistent with protected rights.Civil rightsCanadaLegislative powerCanadaCivil rightsLegislative power342.71/085Hiebert Janet1960-1485858MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910783794403321Charter conflicts3705141UNINA