04570oam 2200685 a 450 991078376150332120231206222425.01-282-85894-797866128589490-7735-6877-810.1515/9780773568778(CKB)1000000000244962(SSID)ssj0000281758(PQKBManifestationID)11211256(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000281758(PQKBWorkID)10306798(PQKB)10961122(CaPaEBR)400045(CaBNvSL)mat00310911(DE-B1597)655674(DE-B1597)9780773568778(VaAlCD)20.500.12592/00n1fb(MiAaPQ)EBC3330528(MiAaPQ)EBC3243495(EXLCZ)99100000000024496220000824d2000 uy 0engurcn|||||||||txtccrThe Marshall decision and native rights[electronic resource] /Ken S. CoatesMontréal [Que.] McGill-Queen's University Pressc2000xxiii, 246 pMcGill-Queen's native and northern series ;25Includes index.0-7735-2104-6 Includes bibliographical references (p. [223]-236) and index.Front Matter -- Contents -- Preface -- Acknowledgments -- Of Eels, Judges, and Lobsters: The Marshall Challenge and the Supreme Court Decision -- Paying the Price for History: Mi’kmaq, Maliseet, and Colonists from Treaties to Irrelevance -- Mi’kmaq and Maliseet Frustrations: Social Crises and Government Responses -- Prelude to Marshall: Aboriginal and Treaty Rights in Canada -- Thomas Peter Paul and the Mi’kmaq Logging Dispute -- The Marshall Crisis and East Coast Confrontations -- Postlude to Marshall: Joshua Bernard, Lobster Licences, and the Refinement of Mi’kmaq Rights -- What Does It Mean? The Marshall Decision, East Coast Fisheries, and Aboriginal Rights -- Appendices -- Maritime First Nations Communities: Population -- Lobster Quotas and Mi’kmaq Fishing Rights -- Treaty of 1760 -- Notes -- IndexIn The Marshall Decision and Native Rights Ken Coates explains the cross-cultural, legal, and political implications of the recent Supreme Court decision on the Donald Marshall case. He describes the events, personalities, and conflicts that brought the Maritimes to the brink of a major confrontation between Mi'kmaq and the non-Mi'kmaq fishers in the fall of 1999, detailing the bungling by federal departments and the lack of police preparedness. He shows how political, business, and Mi'kmaq leaders in the Maritimes handled the volatile situation, urging non-violence and speaking out against racism, in contrast to the way federal and regional leaders have responded in other parts of the country. Legal victories such as Marshall, argues Coates, are a double-edged sword that provide greater legal clarity but expand the gap between indigenous and non-indigenous peoples in Canada. Coates recounts the history of Mi'kmaq-white contact in the region and considers the impact of native rights on natural resources, showing that the costs will be borne mainly by rural Canadians. By placing the local and regional reaction to the Marshall decision in the broader historical, national, and international context of indigenous political and legal rights The Marshall Decision and Native Rights shows how little Canada has learned from three decades of First Nations legal conflicts and how far the country is from meaningful reconciliation.McGill-Queen's native and northern series ;25Malecite IndiansGovernment relationsMi'kmaq peoplesGovernment relationsNatural resourcesGovernment policyMaritime ProvincesMalecite IndiansLegal status, laws, etcMi'kmaq peoplesLegal status, laws, etcMalecite IndiansGovernment relations.Mi'kmaq peoplesGovernment relations.Natural resourcesGovernment policyMalecite IndiansLegal status, laws, etc.Mi'kmaq peoplesLegal status, laws, etc.323.1/19730715Coates Kenneth1956-229466MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910783761503321The Marshall decision and native rights3859847UNINA