03545nam 2200685 a 450 991078375720332120231206205526.01-282-85887-497866128588710-7735-6870-010.1515/9780773568709(CKB)1000000000245006(OCoLC)76898641(CaPaEBR)ebrary10121235(SSID)ssj0000283763(PQKBManifestationID)11254188(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000283763(PQKBWorkID)10248975(PQKB)10414981(CaPaEBR)400162(CaBNvSL)gtp00521441 (Au-PeEL)EBL3330699(CaPaEBR)ebr10132882(CaONFJC)MIL285887(OCoLC)929120869(VaAlCD)20.500.12592/txz1rh(schport)gibson_crkn/2009-12-01/1/400162(MiAaPQ)EBC3330699(DE-B1597)656326(DE-B1597)9780773568709(MiAaPQ)EBC3243774(EXLCZ)99100000000024500620000426d2001 uy 0engurcn|||||||||txtccrRites of privacy and the privacy trade[electronic resource] on the limits of protection for the self /Elizabeth NeillMontreal ; Ithaca McGill-Queen's University Press20011 online resource (208 p.)Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph0-7735-2113-5 0-7735-2097-X Includes bibliographical references and index.Front Matter -- Contents -- Diagrams -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- The Ontological Structure of Natural Rights -- Distinguishing between Privacy and Autonomy -- Defending the Ontological Theory -- Why Privacy? -- Transgressing Privacy: The Theory Applied to Trade -- Conclusion -- Notes -- Bibliography -- IndexIn Rites of Privacy and the Privacy Trade Neill constructs an original theory of natural rights and human dignity to ground our right to privacy, arguing that privacy and autonomy are innate natural properties metaphorically represented on the moral level and socially bestowed. She develops her position by drawing on works in history, sociology, metaphor, law, and the moral psychology of Lawrence Kohlberg. The resulting theory provides surprising answers to controversial and pressing questions regarding, for instance, our right to privacy for medical records in various contexts and in relation to various authority structures, including government. Neill demonstrates that, while we have some entitlement to protection of privacy, entitlement does not have the moral scope suggested by currently entrenched legal and social norms. She cautions against some of the privacy privileges we currently enjoy - referring specifically to claims such as those against insurance companies to prevent access to medical records - and suggests that if they are to be continued, respect for privacy is not the reason.Privacy, Right ofDroit à la vie privéePrivacy, Right of.Droit à la vie privée.323.44/8Neill Elizabeth1962-1506418MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910783757203321Rites of privacy and the privacy trade3736640UNINA