04197oam 2200649I 450 991078293460332120230421042009.01-134-82015-11-280-18276-897866101827631-134-82016-X0-203-00649-610.4324/9780203006498 (CKB)1000000000006919(EBL)165376(OCoLC)70724429(SSID)ssj0000283731(PQKBManifestationID)11228266(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000283731(PQKBWorkID)10250226(PQKB)10601184(MiAaPQ)EBC165376(Au-PeEL)EBL165376(CaPaEBR)ebr5002858(CaONFJC)MIL18276(OCoLC)1000437420(EXLCZ)99100000000000691920180331d1995 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrRicardo, the new view /Samuel HollanderLondon ;New York :Routledge,1995.1 online resource (385 p.)Collected essays ;1Description based upon print version of record.0-415-75643-X 0-415-11582-5 Includes bibliographical references and index.RICARDO - THE NEW VIEW Collected Essays 1; Copyright; Contents; Preface; Acknowledgements; Introduction; Part I. On the interpretation of the early Ricardo; 1. Ricardo's Analysis of the Profit Rate, 1813-15[1973]; 2.Ricardo and the Corn Profit Model:Reply to Eatewell [1975]; 3. Professor Garegnani's Defence of Sraffa on the Material Rate of Profit [1983]; 4. On a 'New Interpretation' of Ricardo's Early Treatment of Profitability [1986]; 5. Sraffa's Rational Reconstruction of Ricardo: On Three Contributions to The Cambridge Journal of Economics [1995]Part II. Responses to critics of The Economics of David Ricardo6. The Economics of David Ricardo: A Response to Professor O'brien [1982]; 7. A Reply to Professor Roncaglia [1982]; 8. 'Professor Hollander and Ricardian Economics': A Reply to Processor Moss [1982]; Part III. Ricardian micro-economics; 9. On the Substantive Identity of the Ricardian and Neo-Classical Conceptions of Economic Organization: The French Connection in British Classicism [1982]; 10. Why Marshall was Right About Ricardo [1989]; 11. On Composition Of Demand and Income Distribution in Classical Economics [1989]12. On the Endogeneity of the Margin and Related Issues in Ricardian Economics [1991]Part IV. The Ricardian growth model; 13. On the Interpretation of Ricardian Economics the Assumption Regarding Wages [1983]; 14. The Wage Path in Cassical Growth Models: Ricardo, Malthus and Mill [1984]; 15. Ricardian Growth Theory: A Resolution of Some Problems in Textual Interpretation [1990]; 16. A Reply to Processor Stigler and Dr peach [1990]; 17. On the Textual Interpretation of Ricardian Growth Theory: The 'New View' Confirmed (Again) [1994]; Part V. Further intellectual linkages18. The Reception of Ricardian Economics [1977]19. The Role of Bentham in the Early Development of Ricardian Theory: A Speculative Essay [1979]; 20. On Professor Samuelson's Canonical Classical Model of Political Economy [1980]; IndexSamuel Hollander's interpretation of Ricardo has attracted apoplectic responses from both Right and Left. This volume collects together the material needed to evaluate these responses. His basic position - that Ricardo stands in a continuous analytical line leading from Adam Smith to Alfred Marshall - is seen to antagonise both those who argue for a 'marginal revolution' and a sharp divide between classical and neo-classical economics, and those who want to champion Ricardo as a forerunner of Sraffa.EconomistsGreat BritainEconomists330.15/3Hollander Samuel.119993MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910782934603321Ricardo, the new view3743723UNINA