02688nam 2200589 a 450 991078284140332120230721005256.01-282-48509-197866124850911-60473-305-5(CKB)1000000000721931(EBL)515561(OCoLC)317396406(SSID)ssj0000168856(PQKBManifestationID)11153720(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000168856(PQKBWorkID)10192866(PQKB)11000641(StDuBDS)EDZ0000203706(MiAaPQ)EBC515561(MdBmJHUP)muse13613(Au-PeEL)EBL515561(CaPaEBR)ebr10282585(CaONFJC)MIL248557(EXLCZ)99100000000072193120070524d2008 ub 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrA hard rain fell[electronic resource] SDS and why it failed /David BarberJackson University Press of Mississippic20081 online resource (299 p.)Description based upon print version of record.1-934110-17-5 Includes bibliographical references (p. 259-269) and index.Introduction : why the New Left failed -- The New Left and the Black movement, 1965-1968 -- The New Left and the American empire, 1962-1968 -- The New Left and feminism, 1965-1969 -- The New Left starts to disintegrate -- Reasserting the centrality of White radicals -- Conclusion : the price of the liberation.By the spring of 1969, Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) had reached its zenith as the largest, most radical movement of white youth in American history-a genuine New Left. Yet less than a year later, SDS splintered into warring factions and ceased to exist. SDS\'s development and its dissolution grew directly out of the organization\'s relations with the black freedom movement, the movement against the Vietnam War, and the newly emerging struggle for women\'s liberation. For a moment, young white people could comprehend their world in new and revolutionary ways. But New Leftists did notNew LeftUnited StatesHistoryCollege studentsPolitical activityUnited StatesHistoryNew LeftHistory.College studentsPolitical activityHistory.378.1/981Barber David1950-1540557MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910782841403321A hard rain fell3792286UNINA