03699nam 22007091 450 991078279880332120140425114829.01-4725-6427-81-281-76134-697866117613491-84731-411-210.5040/9781472564276(CKB)1000000000691231(EBL)361638(OCoLC)437224575(SSID)ssj0000257317(PQKBManifestationID)12078890(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000257317(PQKBWorkID)10253730(PQKB)10356527(MiAaPQ)EBC1772608(MiAaPQ)EBC361638(OCoLC)560615413(UtOrBLW)bpp09256381(Au-PeEL)EBL361638(EXLCZ)99100000000069123120140929d2008 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrTerrorism and the limitation of rights the ECHR and the US constitution /Stefan Sottiaux1st ed.Oxford ; Portland, OR :Hart Publishing,2008.1 online resource (472 p.)Human rights law in perspective ;v. 12Originally presented as the author's thesis (doctoral)--Universiteit Antwerpen, 2006.1-84113-763-4 Includes bibliographical references (pages [411]-435) and index.1. Introduction -- 2. The Limitation of Rights under the European Convention and the US Constitution -- 3. The Right to Freedom of Expression -- 4. The Right to Freedom of Association -- 5. The Right to Personal Liberty -- 6. The Right to Privacy -- 7. The Right to a Fair Trial -- 8. Conclusion."Taking as a starting point the widely accepted view that states confronted with terrorism must find a proper equilibrium between their respective obligations of preserving fundamental rights and fighting terrorism effectively, this book seeks to demonstrate how the design and enforcement of a human rights instrument may influence the result of that exercise. An attempt is made to answer the question how a legal order's approach to the limitation of rights may shape decision-making trade-offs between the demands of liberty and the need to guarantee individual and collective security. In doing so, special attention is given to the difference between the adjudicative methods of balancing and categorisation. The book challenges the conventional wisdom that individual rights, in times of crisis, are better served by the application of categorical rather than flexible models of limitation. In addition, the work considers the impact of a variety of other factors, including the discrepancies in enforcing an international convention as opposed to a national constitution and the use of emergency provisions permitting derogations from human rights obligations in time of war or a public emergency."--Bloomsbury Publishing.Human rights law in perspective ;v. 12.Civil rightsEuropeCivil rightsUnited StatesTerrorism (International law)TerrorismEuropeTerrorismUnited StatesInternational human rights lawCivil rightsCivil rightsTerrorism (International law)TerrorismTerrorism342.4085Sottiaux Stefan510197UtOrBLWUtOrBLWBOOK9910782798803321Terrorism and the limitation of rights765464UNINA