02734nam 2200577 a 450 991078121670332120230725050555.00-8214-4368-2(CKB)2550000000039829(EBL)1743671(OCoLC)739722957(SSID)ssj0000523462(PQKBManifestationID)11322377(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000523462(PQKBWorkID)10540274(PQKB)10293517(MiAaPQ)EBC1743671(MdBmJHUP)muse12714(Au-PeEL)EBL1743671(CaPaEBR)ebr10481030(iGPub)CSPLUS0007491(EXLCZ)99255000000003982920110114d2011 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrThe intentional spectrum and intersubjectivity[electronic resource] phenomenology and the Pittsburgh Neo-Hegelians /Michael D. BarberAthens, Ohio Ohio University Pressc20111 online resource (343 p.)Series in Continental thoughtDescription based upon print version of record.0-8214-1961-7 Includes bibliographical references and index.Preface; 1: The Debate about Perception; 2: The Debate about Perception; 3: The Fullness of Perception; 4: Tradition and Discourse, I-We and I-Thou; 5: McDowell's Wittgensteinian Quietism; 6: Self-Reflectivity, Radical Reflection, and Consciousness; 7: The Levels of Ethics; 8: Phenomenology, the Intentional Spectrum, and Intersubjectivity; Notes; Bibliography; IndexWorld-renowned analytic philosophers John McDowell and Robert Brandom, dubbed "Pittsburgh Neo-Hegelians," recently engaged in an intriguing debate about perception. In The Intentional Spectrum and Intersubjectivity Michael D. Barber is the first to bring phenomenology to bear not just on the perspectives of McDowell or Brandom alone, but on their intersection. He argues that McDowell accounts better for the intelligibility of empirical content by defending holistically functioning, reflectively distinguishable sensory and intellectual intentional structures. He reconstructs dimensions impliciSeries in Continental thought.Perception (Philosophy)PhenomenologyPerception (Philosophy)Phenomenology.121/.34Barber Michael D.1949-968665MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910781216703321The intentional spectrum and intersubjectivity3757313UNINA