03720nam 2200685 a 450 991078099510332120200520144314.097866125379360-226-30513-91-282-53793-810.7208/9780226305134(CKB)2520000000006458(EBL)496617(OCoLC)593295916(SSID)ssj0000343130(PQKBManifestationID)11258936(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000343130(PQKBWorkID)10289222(PQKB)11764766(StDuBDS)EDZ0000122699(MiAaPQ)EBC496617(DE-B1597)523717(OCoLC)1135583372(DE-B1597)9780226305134(Au-PeEL)EBL496617(CaPaEBR)ebr10372063(CaONFJC)MIL253793(EXLCZ)99252000000000645820041101d2005 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrSpeak no evil[electronic resource] the triumph of hate speech regulation /Jon B. GouldChicago University of Chicago Pressc20051 online resource (255 p.)Description based upon print version of record.0-226-30553-8 0-226-30554-6 Includes bibliographical references (p. 203-234) and index.Background and chronology -- Theoretical implications -- The rise of hate speech codes -- The courts act -- While they slept -- The triumph of hate speech regulation.Opponents of speech codes often argue that liberal academics use the codes to advance an agenda of political correctness. But Jon B. Gould's provocative book, based on an enormous amount of empirical evidence, reveals that the real reasons for their growth are to be found in the pragmatic, almost utilitarian, considerations of college administrators. Instituting hate speech policy, he shows, was often a symbolic response taken by university leaders to reassure campus constituencies of their commitment against intolerance. In an academic version of "keeping up with the Joneses," some schools created hate speech codes to remain within what they saw as the mainstream of higher education. Only a relatively small number of colleges crafted codes out of deep commitment to their merits. Although college speech codes have been overturned by the courts, Speak No Evil argues that their rise has still had a profound influence on curtailing speech in other institutions such as the media and has also shaped mass opinion and common understandings of constitutional norms. Ultimately, Gould contends, this kind of informal law can have just as much power as the Constitution.Hate speechUnited StatesHistoryRace discriminationLaw and legislationUnited StatesFreedom of speechUnited Stateshate speech, censorship, first amendment, regulation, government, political correctness, college administration, higher education, student protest, intolerance, tolerance, media, constitution, liberty, freedom, racism, discrimination, antisemitism, politics, social issues, nonfiction, banned, guest speakers, community, safe spaces.Hate speechHistory.Race discriminationLaw and legislationFreedom of speech345.73/0256HF 610BVBrvkGould Jon B1507211MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910780995103321Speak no evil3737748UNINA