03812nam 2200733 a 450 991078060090332120230607214453.09786155211225978-6-15521-122-5615-5211-22-11-281-37680-997866113768020-585-46539-810.1515/9786155211225(CKB)111087028333684(SSID)ssj0000203551(PQKBManifestationID)11181031(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000203551(PQKBWorkID)10173966(PQKB)11367295(MiAaPQ)EBC3137241(OCoLC)52880230(MdBmJHUP)muse48215(Au-PeEL)EBL3137241(CaPaEBR)ebr10173753(CaONFJC)MIL137680(OCoLC)922997940(DE-B1597)633296(DE-B1597)9786155211225(EXLCZ)9911108702833368420020517d2002 uy 0engurcn|||||||||txtccrMission accomplished[electronic resource] on founding constitutional adjudication in Central Europe /by Radoslav ProcházkaBudapest ;New York Central European University Press2002xiv, 358 pBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph963-9241-51-2 Includes bibliographical references (p. [329]-346) and index.Frontmatter -- CONTENTS -- PREFACE -- LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS -- LIST OF TABLES -- LIST OF FIGURES -- Introduction -- PART I -- Chapter 1 Establishing Constitutional Review -- Chapter 2 Designing Constitutional Review -- PART II -- Chapter 3 Adjudicative Approaches -- Chapter 4 Interpretive Techniques -- Chapter 5 Founding and Beyond -- NOTES -- BIBLIOGRAPHY -- TABLES -- INDEXExamines constitutional jurisdiction in the so-called Visegrad Four: Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The creation of constitutional courts was one of the major milestones in the re-creation of the democratic system in these countries. In Europe constitutional courts exert much of the functions of the Supreme Court of the US. However, the immediate western European samples showed marked differences, which is why besides similarities, the theory and practice of constitutional law show differences in these four countries. Procházka analyses and explains these similarities and differences.  Mission Accomplished contributes to the literature on comparative constitutional law by offering insights into the constitutional discourses that go beyond the discussion of notorious cases and events in these four countries. Procházka argues that the various historical, cultural, socio-psychological, political and institutional contexts have translated into different modes of constitutional adjudication and interpretation.Constitutional courtsEurope, EasternConstitutional lawEurope, EasternJudicial reviewEurope, EasternPolitical questions and judicial powerEurope, EasternPost-communismEurope, EasternConstitutional courts, Constitutional law, Czechia, Hungary, Judicial review, Poland, Slovakia.Constitutional courtsConstitutional lawJudicial reviewPolitical questions and judicial powerPost-communism347.47/012Procházka Radoslav1500680MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910780600903321Mission accomplished3727468UNINA