03329nam 22006252 450 991078008850332120230925164441.01-107-11876-X0-521-03745-X0-511-15387-20-511-32811-70-511-17419-50-511-48787-81-280-42103-70-511-04912-9(CKB)111056485620346(EBL)201734(OCoLC)437063157(SSID)ssj0000248637(PQKBManifestationID)11218980(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000248637(PQKBWorkID)10201844(PQKB)11452765(UkCbUP)CR9780511487873(MiAaPQ)EBC201734(Au-PeEL)EBL201734(CaPaEBR)ebr10001911(CaONFJC)MIL42103(EXLCZ)9911105648562034620090227d1999|||| uy 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierThe Son of Man debate a history and evaluation /Delbert BurkettCambridge :Cambridge University Press,1999.1 online resource (xiv, 176 pages) digital, PDF file(s)Society for New Testament Studies monograph series ;1070-521-66306-7 0-511-01330-2 Includes bibliographical references (p. 126-161) and indexes.Preface -- List of abbreviations -- Introduction -- Genealogical interpretation --The human Son of Man -- The apocalyptic/messianic Son of Man -- The question of reference -- The question of authenticity -- Miscellaneous sons of men -- Exit the apocalyptic Son of Man? -- The idiomatic/nontitular son of man -- Son of Man in apocalyptic and rabbinic texts -- Conclusions -- Appendix: Surveys of research on "the Son of Man" -- List of references -- Index of passages --Index of authors -- Index of subjects.The expression 'Son of Man', used in the Gospels almost exclusively by Jesus, has been the object of intensive study since the Protestant Reformation, yet scholars have come to no agreement on its origin or meaning. Research in this area has been described as 'a veritable mine field' and 'a can of worms'. Because of the scope and complexity of the literature, no comprehensive survey of the subject has been written in the twentieth century. Delbert Burkett's book fills this need. It provides a comprehensive historical overview of the debate from the patristic period to 1996, and gives an evaluation of that research and a summation of the present state of the question. Burkett concludes that despite nineteen centuries of 'Son of Man' study there is no consensus concerning the meaning or origin of the expression; the debate is therefore a prime example of the limits of New Testament scholarship.Monograph series (Society for New Testament Studies) ;107.Son of ManHistory of doctrinesSon of ManHistory of doctrines.232/.1Burkett Delbert Royce1482114UkCbUPUkCbUPBOOK9910780088503321The Son of Man debate3776058UNINA