04482nam 22006612 450 991078007920332120230523210045.01-107-11202-80-511-00650-01-280-41667-X0-511-17209-50-511-15007-50-511-31000-50-511-49173-50-511-05271-5(CKB)111056485644086(EBL)201992(OCoLC)437063350(SSID)ssj0000225373(PQKBManifestationID)11174392(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000225373(PQKBWorkID)10249772(PQKB)11281425(UkCbUP)CR9780511491733(MiAaPQ)EBC201992(Au-PeEL)EBL201992(CaPaEBR)ebr5005948(CaONFJC)MIL41667(EXLCZ)9911105648564408620090302d1998|||| uy 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierThe power of power politics from classical realism to neotraditionalism /John A. Vasquez[New edition, enlarged].Cambridge :Cambridge University Press,1998.1 online resource (xv, 448 pages) illustrations; digital, PDF file(s)Cambridge studies in international relations ;630-521-44746-1 0-521-44235-4 Includes bibliographical references (p. 387-432) and indexes.pt. I.The Original Text: Classical Realism and Quantitative International Politics.1.The role of paradigms in scientific inquiry: a conceptual framework and a set of principles for paradigm evaluation.2.The role of the realist paradigm in the development of a scientific study of international relations.3.Research design: defining and operationalizing the realist paradigm.4.Theory construction as a paradigm-directed activity.5.Data making as a paradigm-directed activity.6.Research as a paradigm-directed activity.7.Evaluation: the adequacy of the realist paradigm.8.Theory and research in the 1970s: the emerging anomalies --pt. II.Neorealism and Neotraditionalism: International Relations Theory at the Millennium.9.Retrospective: neorealism and the power of power politics.10.The promise and potential pitfalls of post-modernism: the need for theory appraisal.11.The realist paradigm as a degenerating research program: neotraditionalism and Waltz's balancing proposition.12.Mearsheimer's multipolar myths and the false promise of realist policy prescriptions: the empirical inaccuracy of the realist paradigm.13.Challenging the relevance and explanatory power of the realist paradigm: the debate on the end of the Cold War.14.Conclusion: the continuing inadequacy of the realist paradigm.In this much-expanded 1999 edition of his classic study, John Vasquez examines the power of the power politics perspective to dominate inquiry, and evaluates its ability to provide accurate explanations of the fundamental forces underlying world politics. Part I of the book reprints the original 1983 text of The Power of Power Politics. It examines classical realism and quantitative international politics, providing an intellectual history of the discipline and an evaluation of statistical research guided by the realist paradigm. The second part provides six new chapters covering neorealism, post-modernism, the neotraditional research program on balancing, Mearsheimer's analysis of multipolarity and institutionalism, the debate on the end of the Cold War, and neoliberalism. Through the use of comparative case studies these chapters analyse the extent to which the realist paradigm has been progressive (or degenerating), empirically accurate, and remains a relevant and explanatorily powerful theoretical approach for our current era.Cambridge studies in international relations ;63.International relationsResearchBalance of powerResearchInternational relationsResearch.Balance of powerResearch.327.1/072Vasquez John A.1945-1465357UkCbUPUkCbUPBOOK9910780079203321The power of power politics3775983UNINA