01126nam a2200241 i 4500991001906339707536121130s it 000 0 spa db14089865-39ule_instBiblioteca Interfacoltàita322.10946 Coppola, Salvatore69672Clero disidente y homilías conflictivas en la España franquista :1968-1975 /Salvatore Coppola ; en colaboración con María del Carmen Vara GordilloCastiglione :Giorgiani,2012178 p. :ill. ;21 cmChiesa e StatoSpagna1968-1975Vara Gordillo, María del Carmen.b1408986501-10-2030-11-12991001906339707536LE002 322.10946 COP12002000898173le002gE0.00-l- 00000.i1546450730-11-12LE023 322.109 COP 1 112023000160015le023-E18.00-l- 00000.i1547089118-12-12Clero disidente y homilías conflictivas en la España franquista241296UNISALENTOle002le02330-11-12ma -spait 0003445nam 2200625 a 450 991077972060332120230725061533.03-11-032186-610.1515/9783110321869(CKB)2550000001096767(EBL)1215555(OCoLC)851972102(SSID)ssj0000801546(PQKBManifestationID)11487053(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000801546(PQKBWorkID)10794103(PQKB)11409922(MiAaPQ)EBC1215555(DE-B1597)210866(OCoLC)853266018(DE-B1597)9783110321869(Au-PeEL)EBL1215555(CaPaEBR)ebr10728811(CaONFJC)MIL503301(EXLCZ)99255000000109676720130717d2010 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrThe rei(g)n of 'rule'[electronic resource] /Dana RiesenfeldFrankfurt ;New Brunswick Ontos Verlag20101 online resource (139 p.)Aporia ;Bd. 2Description based upon print version of record.3-11-032157-2 1-299-72050-1 Includes bibliographical references and index. Frontmatter -- Table of Contents -- Introduction -- I. Rules, norms, conventions and necessity -- 1. Why norms are not conventions and conventions are not norms -- 2. Cavell on normative necessity: The philosopher, the baker, and the pantomime of caution -- II. Rules as conventions vs. rules as norms in the rule-following debates -- 3. What is a rule and what ought it to be -- III. Twisted Language -- 4. Davidson on rules, conventions and norms -- 5. Searle on rules (of rationality, conversation and speech acts) -- Conclusion -- References -- IndexThe Rei(g)n of Rule is a study of rules and their role in language. Rules have dominated the philosophical arena as a fundamental philosophical concept. Little progress, however, has been made in reaching an accepted definition of rules. This fact is not coincidental. The concept of rule is expected to perform various, at times conflicting, tasks. Analyzing key debates and rule related discussions in the philosophy of language I show that typically rules are perceived and defined either as norms or as conventions. As norms, rules perform the evaluative task of distinguishing between correct and incorrect actions. As conventions, rules describe how certain actions are actually undertaken. As normative and conventional requirements do not necessarily coincide, the concept of rule cannot simultaneously accommodate both. The impossibility to consistently define 'rule' has gone unnoticed by philosophers, and it is in this sense that 'rule' has also blocked philosophical attempts to explain language in terms of rules.Aporia (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) ;Bd. 2.Language and languagesPhilosophyRules (Philosophy)Language and languagesPhilosophy.Rules (Philosophy)121.68 22/gerRiesenfeld Dana1468970MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910779720603321The rei(g)n of 'rule3680365UNINA