06951oam 2200769I 450 991077945060332120230803020254.01-135-13203-80-203-07748-21-283-89453-X1-135-13204-610.4324/9780203077481 (CKB)2550000000710883(EBL)1101430(OCoLC)823389787(SSID)ssj0000787246(PQKBManifestationID)12342780(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000787246(PQKBWorkID)10815372(PQKB)10709009(MiAaPQ)EBC1101430(Au-PeEL)EBL1101430(CaPaEBR)ebr10640560(CaONFJC)MIL420703(OCoLC)847597855(OCoLC)1082247400(FINmELB)ELB132524(EXLCZ)99255000000071088320180706d2013 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrThreats of force international law and strategy /Francis GrimalAbingdon, Oxon [U.K.] ;New York :Routledge,2013.1 online resource (241 p.)Routledge research in international lawRoutledge research in international lawDescription based upon print version of record.1-138-84339-3 0-415-60985-2 Includes bibliographical references and index.Cover; Threats of Force: International Law and Strategy; Copyright; Contents; Figures; Foreword; Preface; Table of Cases; Table of International Treaties and Conventions; Introduction; 1 Threats of Force: International Law and Strategy; 2 An Introductory Definition; 3 Chapter Outline; 1. Historical Analysis; 1 1648-1900; 1.1 Westphalia; 1.2 Ad Hoc Treaties: Barbary Treaty and the Treaty of Peace and Amity; 2 1900-1919: Hague Regulations, Treaty of Versailles and the Covenant of the League of Nations; 2.1 Hague Regulations 1907; 2.2 Treaty of Versailles; 2.3 Covenant of the League of Nations3 Inter-War Years3.1 Article 11 Enforcement; 3.2 International Instruments in the Inter-War Period; 4 Judgments of International Military Tribunals; 5 Conclusion; 2. International Instruments Post-Charter; 1 Article 2(4) Within the Overall Context of the Un Charter; 2 Deconstruction of Article 2(4); 2.1 A Threat Against Territorial Integrity or Political Independence; 2.2 Scale; 2.3 Legal Test; 2.4 Exceptions to the Prohibition; 2.5 Interpretation; 2.6 What Constitutes a Threat?; 3 Threat Categorisation; 3.1 Verbal Threat; 3.2 Defensive Treaty; 3.3 Series of Communications3.4 Military Manoeuvres3.5 Context?; 3.6 Indirect Threat; 4 Threat Perception; 4.1 Customary Status?; 5 1970 Declaration on the Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation Among States; 6 1987 Declaration on the Enhancement of the Effectiveness of the Principle of Refraining from the Threat or Use of Force in International Relations; 7 Conclusion; 3. Judicial Interpretation; 1 The Corfu Channel Case; 1.1 October 22, 1946; 1.2 November 12/13, 1946; 2 The Nicaragua Case; 3 Nuclear Weapons Advisory Opinion; 4 Trident Cases; 5 Lord Advocate's Reference No. 16 Oil Platforms Case7 Guyana and Suriname; 8 Conclusion; 4. Un Interpretation; 1 The General Assembly; 1.1 Albania, Bulgaria and Yugoslavia V. Greece; 1.2 Palestine; 1.3 China V. Ussr; 1.4 More General Declarations and References; 2 Nuclear Weapons; 2.1 The Protection of Non-Nuclear Weapon States; 2.2 Follow-Up to the ICJ's Advisory Opinion; 3 The Security Council; 3.1 Legal Status; 3.2 Turkish Invasion of Northern Cyprus; 3.3 South Africa; 3.4 Iraq; 4 Un Secretary General; 4.1 Legal Basis; 4.2 An Agenda for Peace: Preventive Diplomacy Peacemaking and Peace-Keeping4.3 The High Level Panel Report5 Conclusion; 5. Threat Theory; 1 Strategy and Deterrence; 1.1 The Credo: Capability, Credibility, Communication and Commitment; 1.2 Deterrence V. Compellence; 2 Hegemonic International Law; 2.1 Definition and Structure; 3 Customary International Law; 3.1 State Practice (Actual Practice); 3.2 Opinio Juris; 4 Just War Theory; 5 Theoretical Perspectives; 6 Conclusion; 6. Nuclear Proliferation - A Threat of Force?; 1 Non-Proliferation Treaty; 2 Iran; 3 North Korea; 4 Conclusion; 7. An Alternative Means of Prohibiting Threats of Force Within Article 2(4)1 Weaknesses of Article 2(4)"Despite recent attempts by scholars to examine the absolute prohibition of threats of force under Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, threats remain a largely un-chartered area in international law when compared with actual uses of force. Adopting an interdisciplinary approach and drawing on the works of strategic literature and international relations theory, this book examines the theoretical nature behind a threat of force in order to inform and explain why and how the normative structure operates in the way it does. The core of the book addresses whether Article 2(4) is adequately suited to the current international climate and, if not, whether an alternative means of rethinking Article 2(4) would provide a better solution. Francis Grimal also addresses two other fundamental issues within the realm of threats of force that remain largely unexplored in present literature. Firstly, the interrelationship between threats of force and self-defence, would a state have to suffer an armed attack before threatening force in self-defence or could it threaten force pre-emptively? Can a state lawfully use a threat of force as a means of self-defence rather than force under the present Charter system? Finally, the book explores the point at which a state pursuing nuclear capabilities may breach Article 2(4) with particular reference to both North Korean and Iranian efforts to pursue nuclear technology.This topical book will be of great interest not only to scholars and postgraduates in international law but also to academics and students across several fields due to its interdisciplinary approach including strategic studies and international relations theories."--Provided by publisher.Routledge Research in International LawUltimatums (International relations)Aggression (International law)Pacific settlement of international disputesUltimatums (International relations)Aggression (International law)Pacific settlement of international disputes.341.5/8LAW000000LAW051000POL011000bisacshGrimal Francis.1496357MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910779450603321Threats of force3720980UNINA