03739nam 22007092 450 991077895500332120160512163855.01-107-22800-X1-139-20971-X1-280-56880-11-139-22260-097866135984001-139-03529-01-139-22431-X1-139-21780-11-139-21471-31-139-22088-8(CKB)2550000000082916(EBL)833452(OCoLC)775869902(SSID)ssj0000640150(PQKBManifestationID)11408507(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000640150(PQKBWorkID)10611522(PQKB)11565578(UkCbUP)CR9781139035293(MiAaPQ)EBC833452(Au-PeEL)EBL833452(CaPaEBR)ebr10533187(CaONFJC)MIL359840(EXLCZ)99255000000008291620110301d2012|||| uy| 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierProportionality constitutional rights and their limitations /Aharon Barak ; translated from the Hebrew by Doron Kalir[electronic resource]Cambridge :Cambridge University Press,2012.1 online resource (xxvi, 611 pages) digital, PDF file(s)Cambridge studies in constitutional law ;2Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).1-107-40119-4 1-107-00858-1 Includes bibliographical references and index.Pt. I. Constitutional rights : scope and limitations -- Constitutional rights : scope and the extent of its protection -- Determining the scope of constitutional rights -- Conflicting constitutional rights -- Limitation of constitutional rights -- Limiting constitutional rights by law -- Pt. II. Proportionality : sources, nature, function -- The nature and function of proportionality -- The historical origins of proportionality -- The legal sources of proportionality -- Pt. III. The components of proportionality -- Proper purpose -- Rational connection -- Necessity -- Proportionality stricto sensu (balancing) -- Proportionality and reasonableness -- Zone of proportionality : legislator and judge -- Proportionality and positive constitutional rights -- The burden of proof -- Pt. IV. Proportionality evaluated -- Proportionality's importance -- The criticism on proportionality and a retort -- Alternatives to proportionality -- The future of proportionality.Having identified proportionality as the main tool for limiting constitutional rights, Aharon Barak explores its four components (proper purpose, rational connection, necessity and proportionality stricto sensu) and discusses the relationships between proportionality and reasonableness and between courts and legislation. He goes on to analyse the concept of deference and to consider the main arguments against the use of proportionality (incommensurability and irrationality). Alternatives to proportionality are compared and future developments of proportionality are suggested.Cambridge studies in constitutional law ;2.Constitutional lawProportionality in lawConstitutional law.Proportionality in law.342PL 625rvkBarak Aharon236233Kalir DoronUkCbUPUkCbUPBOOK9910778955003321Proportionality853642UNINA