02713oam 2200625I 450 991077870040332120200520144314.01-135-22975-91-135-22976-71-282-44417-497866124441730-203-09263-510.4324/9780203092637 (CKB)1000000000811376(EBL)455480(OCoLC)609844540(Au-PeEL)EBL455480(CaPaEBR)ebr10358650(CaONFJC)MIL244417(OCoLC)742296894(OCoLC)893194508(OCoLC)1059568957(FINmELB)ELB149184(MiAaPQ)EBC455480(EXLCZ)99100000000081137620180706d2010 uy 0engur|n|---|||||Bad news /Glasgow University Media GroupAbingdon, Oxon :Routledge,2010.1 online resource (331 p.)Routledge revivalsFirst published in 1976 by Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.Vol. 2 has title: More bad news.0-415-56787-4 0-415-56376-3 Includes bibliographical references and index.BOOK COVER; TITLE_01; COPYRIGHT_01; COPYRIGHT_02; TITLE_02; COPYRIGHT_03; CONTENTS; FOREWORD; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS; 1 REVIEWING THE NEWS; 2 CONSTRUCTING THE PROJECT; 3 INSIDE THE TELEVISION NEWSROOM; 4 MEASURE FOR EASURE; 5 CONTOURS OF COVERAGE; 6 TRADES UINIONS AND THE MEDIA; 7 DOWN TO CASES; APPENDIX 1; APPENDIX 2; NOTES; INDEXIt is a commonly held belief that television news in Britain, on whatever channel, is more objective, more trustworthy, more neutral than press reporting. The illusion is exploded in this controversial study by the Glasgow University Media Group, originally published in 1976.The authors undertook an exhaustive monitoring of all television broadcasts over 6 months, from January to June 1975, with particular focus upon industrial news broadcasts, the TUC, strikes and industrial action, business and economic affairs.Their analysis showed how television news favours certain indiviRoutledge revivals.Television broadcasting of newsGreat BritainBroadcast journalismGreat BritainJournalismObjectivityTelevision broadcasting of newsBroadcast journalismJournalismObjectivity.070.19384.554MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910778700403321Bad News1741290UNINA