03732nam 22006254a 450 991077845620332120231002224807.00-674-03996-310.4159/9780674039964(CKB)1000000000805535(EBL)3300665(SSID)ssj0000224062(PQKBManifestationID)11186122(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000224062(PQKBWorkID)10209464(PQKB)10952145(MiAaPQ)EBC3300665(Au-PeEL)EBL3300665(CaPaEBR)ebr10328843(OCoLC)923112721(DE-B1597)571810(DE-B1597)9780674039964(EXLCZ)99100000000080553520030923d2004 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierPolitics of nature how to bring the sciences into democracy /Bruno Latour ; translated by Catherine PorterCambridge, Mass. :Harvard University Press,2004.1 online resource (x, 307 pages) illustrations0-674-01289-5 0-674-01347-6 Includes bibliographical references and index.Frontmatter --Acknowledgments --Contents --Introduction: What Is to Be Done with Political Ecology? --1. Why Political Ecology Has to Let Go of Nature --2. How to Bring the Collective Together --3. A New Separation of Powers --4. Skills for the Collective --5. Exploring Common Worlds --Conclusion: What Is to Be Done? Political Ecology! --Summary of the Argument (for Readers in a Hurry . . .) --Glossary --Notes --Bibliography --IndexA major work by one of the more innovative thinkers of our time, Politics of Nature does nothing less than establish the conceptual context for political ecology--transplanting the terms of ecology into more fertile philosophical soil than its proponents have thus far envisioned. Bruno Latour announces his project dramatically: "Political ecology has nothing whatsoever to do with nature, this jumble of Greek philosophy, French Cartesianism and American parks." Nature, he asserts, far from being an obvious domain of reality, is a way of assembling political order without due process. Thus, his book proposes an end to the old dichotomy between nature and society--and the constitution, in its place, of a collective, a community incorporating humans and nonhumans and building on the experiences of the sciences as they are actually practiced. In a critique of the distinction between fact and value, Latour suggests a redescription of the type of political philosophy implicated in such a "commonsense" division--which here reveals itself as distinctly uncommonsensical and in fact fatal to democracy and to a healthy development of the sciences. Moving beyond the modernist institutions of "mononaturalism" and "multiculturalism," Latour develops the idea of "multinaturalism," a complex collectivity determined not by outside experts claiming absolute reason but by "diplomats" who are flexible and open to experimentation.Political ecologyGreen movementHuman ecologyScienceSocial aspectsPolitical ecology.Green movement.Human ecology.ScienceSocial aspects.320.5/8MB 3000rvkLatour Bruno62052MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910778456203321Politics of nature3746509UNINA