04765nam 2200637Ia 450 991077833720332120230721031958.01-283-10240-497866131024091-135-46951-20-203-92735-4(CKB)1000000000482537(EBL)332841(OCoLC)476135317(SSID)ssj0000229193(PQKBManifestationID)11219579(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000229193(PQKBWorkID)10167668(PQKB)10603651(MiAaPQ)EBC332841(Au-PeEL)EBL332841(CaPaEBR)ebr10209578(CaONFJC)MIL310240(EXLCZ)99100000000048253720071107d2008 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrPromises, oaths, and vows[electronic resource] on the psychology of promising /Herbert J. SchlesingerNew York Analytic Press20081 online resource (231 p.)Description based upon print version of record.1-138-00590-8 0-88163-454-9 Includes bibliographical references and index.Cover; Promises, Oaths, and Vows; Copyright; Contents; Preface; Acknowledgments; Chapter 1. Promising and Morality; The Scientific Study of Morality; The Everyday Meaning of Promising; Categories of Promises; Promising and Culture; Promising and Rationality; Chapter 2 Why Do We Make Promises? Promise Keeping as One of the Defining Acts of Morality: Philosophical, Historical, and Legal Background; A Definition of Promising; Why Do We Keep Promises?; Chapter 3. Promising and the Theory of Mind in Development; Memory versus Perception; Self from Other; Past from Present and Present from FutureInternal and ExternalWord and Deed; Theory of Mind and Magical Thinking; Magical Thinking and Psychoanalysis; Chapter 4. Empirical Studies of Moral Development; Empirical Studies of Intention and Will; The Psychology of Intention; Reflections on the Implications of Lewin's Research; Chapter 5. Developmental and Regressive Aspects of Making and Breaking Promises; Case Example; A Bit of Theory; Case Example, Continued; Implications for Technique; Chapter 6. Mature and Regressive Determinants of the Keeping of Promises; Case ExamplesPromising and Psychopathology: Regression and Magical ThinkingThe Psychology of Intention; Chapter 7. Implicit Promising and the Implicit Promise; The Person to Whom Life Has Failed to Keep Its Promises; The Promising, but Problematic, Patient as an Analytic Candidate; Detecting the "Narcissistic Core" of the Problematic Applicant; Problems Arise as These Analysts Age; Problems for Terminating the Analysis of a Once Promising but Problematic Patient; Another Variety of the Problematic "Promising" Patient; The "Promiser" Who Fails to Live Up to His "Promise"; Chapter 8. Promising in the ClinicPromises of PatientsPromises of Clinicians; Exception 1; Exception 2; Chapter 9. Promising as an Element of Form and Content in Greek Drama; Psychoanalysts and Literature; The Tragic View of Life; Promising as a Formal Element in Greek Drama; The Tragic View of the Hero; The Tragic Hero in Relation to Personality Development; Chapter 10. Promising in Shakespearean Drama; Action and Delay in Psychosexual Development; Promising as a Device Dramatists Use to Heighten Dramatic Tension; A Gloss on Oedipus and Hamlet; The Comedies; The Historical PlaysChapter 11. Forms of Promising in Religious PracticesThe Covenant Form; The Covenants of the Old Testament; The Oath Form; Epilogue; References; IndexConsidering that getting along in civil society is based on the expectation that (most) people will do what they say they will do, i.e., essentially live up to their explicit or implicit promises, it is amazing that so little scientific attention has been given to the act of promising. A great deal of research has been done on the moral development of children, for example, but not on the child's ability to make and keep a promise, one of the highest moral achievements. What makes it possible developmentally, cognitively, and emotionally to make a promise in the first place? And on the othePromisesMoral developmentPromises.Moral development.155.2/5Schlesinger Herbert J1563550MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910778337203321Promises, oaths, and vows3832046UNINA10853nam 2200517 450 991082805580332120231110221920.01-78969-632-1(CKB)4100000011971103(MiAaPQ)EBC6647703(Au-PeEL)EBL6647703(OCoLC)1257889356(EXLCZ)99410000001197110320220702d2021 uy 0engurcnu||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierBurials and society in late Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age Ireland /Cormac McSparronOxford, UK :Archaeopress,[2021]©20211 online resource (177 pages)Queen's University Belfast Irish Archaeological Monograph ;v.11-78969-631-3 Cover -- Title Page -- Copyright page -- Contents Page -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- Foreword and Acknowledgements -- Chapter 1 Introduction -- Aims and Objectives -- Figure 1.1 Photo of a cist containing an inhumation and accompanied by a tripartite bowl from Church Bay, Rathlin, Co. Antrim (after Sloan 2008) -- Figure 1.2 Photo of an inverted vase urn within a cist from Knockroe, Co. Tyrone (Williams and Wilkinson 1988) -- Why study the social structure of the Late Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age by an analysis of the single burial tradition? -- Definitions -- Social structure -- The Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age -- The single burial tradition -- The structure of the book -- Anthropological approaches to the study of death and funerary ritual -- The sociologists -- Introduction -- Figure 1.1 Photo of a cist containing an inhumation and accompanied by a tripartite bowl from Church Bay, Rathlin, Co. Antrim (after Sloan 2008) -- Figure 1.2 Photo of an inverted vase urn within a cist from Knockroe, Co. Tyrone (Williams and Wilkinson 1988) -- Chapter 2 Theoretical Approaches to the study of Death, Funerary Rituals and Social Structure -- The functionalists -- Structuralism -- Modern anthropological studies of death ritual -- Archaeological approaches to the study of death and funerary ritual -- The 'New Archaeology' and its contribution to the study of death and funerary ritual -- Critics of the 'New Archaeology' and their approach to the study of death and funerary ritual -- The new synthesis -- Modern approaches to the study of social structure -- Ranked societies -- Un-ranked or egalitarian societies -- Stratified societies -- Figure 2.1 Diagrammatic summary of the interrelationships of degree of ranking, access to the economic base and social evolutionary typology. -- Conclusions.Figure 2.1 Diagrammatic summary of the interrelationships of degree of ranking, access to the economic base and social evolutionary typology. -- Chapter 3 Ireland in the Late Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age -- Introduction -- The archaeology of the Irish Late Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age -- The Late Chalcolithic / Early Bronze Age environment -- Into the Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age -- Ireland at the cusp of the Chalcolithic -- Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age settlement -- Non-funerary rituals of the Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age in Ireland -- Megalithic burial rituals of the Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age in Ireland -- Figure 3.1 Cloghnagalla, Co. Derry / Londonderry wedge tomb after Herring (1940). -- Wedge tombs and Atlantic Europe -- Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age metallurgy in Ireland -- Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age metalwork -- Daggers -- Halberds -- Gold in Early Bronze Age Ireland -- Is there continuity between Late Neolithic and Chalcolithic Ireland? -- Lunulae -- Provenance of Irish gold -- The transition from the Chalcolithic to the Early Bronze Age -- Previous research on the Early Bronze Age single burial tradition of Ireland -- Figure 3.2 Bowl and Vase forms -- a. simple bowl from Tonyglaskan (Hurl and Murphy 2004), b. bipartite bowl from Straid (Brannon and Williams 1990), c. Necked bipartite bowl from Dungate (Waterman and Brennan 1977), d. tripartite bowl, e. ribbed bowl from -- Figure 3.3 Examples of vase and encrusted urns, a. vase urn from Drumanakeel (Williams and Wilkinson 1985) and b. encrusted urn from Drumanakeel (ibid). -- Figure 3.4 Examples of a cordoned urn a. from Kilcroagh (Williams 1992) and collared urn b. from Lisnagat, (Jope and Jope 1952). -- Summary -- Figure 3.1 Cloghnagalla, Co. Derry / Londonderry wedge tomb after Herring (1940).Table 3.1 Waddell's classification of Irish Daggers -- Figure 3.2 Bowl and Vase forms -- a. simple bowl from Tonyglaskan (Hurl and Murphy 2004), b. bipartite bowl from Straid (Brannon and Williams 1990), c. Necked bipartite bowl from Dungate (Waterman and Brennan 1977), d. tripartite bowl, e. ribbed bowl from -- Figure 3.3 Examples of vase and encrusted urns, a. vase urn from Drumanakeel (Williams and Wilkinson 1985) and b. encrusted urn from Drumanakeel (ibid). -- Figure 3.4 Examples of a cordoned urn a. from Kilcroagh (Williams 1992) and collared urn b. from Lisnagat, (Jope and Jope 1952). -- Chapter 4 Methodology -- Coding and recording the data in a database -- Figure 4.1 Location map of the 206 sites in the database -- The database fields -- Figure 4.2 Dividing cairns / cemetery mounds into quadrants. -- Figure 4.3 Decorative Motif Elements, worked example 'Herringbone- Left, Incised Line, Incised Line Defined' -- Assessing ranking by an examination of burial ritual -- Introduction -- Selection of sites for study -- Figure 4.1 Location map of the 206 sites in the database -- Figure 4.2 Dividing cairns / cemetery mounds into quadrants. -- Figure 4.3 Decorative Motif Elements, worked example 'Herringbone- Left, Incised Line, Incised Line Defined' -- Table 4.1 Qualitative descriptors of statistical significance used in the text and their quantitative equivalents. -- Chapter 5 Radiocarbon Dating the single burial tradition -- Introduction -- Methodology -- Constructing models in OxCal 4.2 -- Criteria for excluding dates from the radiocarbon analysis. -- Other dates excluded from the analysis -- Analysis of the radiocarbon dates from the Late Chalcolithic / Early Bronze Age single burial tradition -- Dating single burial tradition by province -- Dating the single burial tradition across Ireland -- Dating single burial tradition funerary pottery.Dating aspects of pottery decoration -- Dating techniques of decoration -- Defined / undefined decoration -- The chronology of funerary ritual and grave attributes -- Dating cist and polygonal cist burials -- Dating inhumation and cremation -- Dating pits -- Examining cist dates by province -- Dating graves which contain no pottery, pot-less cists and Pits -- Conclusions -- Phasing the Irish single burial tradition -- Figure 5.1 A Diagram of the radiocarbon date ranges of the main attributes of the Late Chalcolithic / Early Bronze Age single burial tradition. Light grey is the 95.4% Start/ End Range, mid grey the 68.2% Start / End Range, black the area within the Start -- Table 5.1 Radiocarbon dates excluded from aspects of the analysis -- Table 5.3 Oxcal 4.2 (Bronk Ramsey 2015) calibrated ranges (Reimer et al. 2013) for the single burial tradition, by province -- Table 5.2 OxCal 4.2 (Bronk Ramsey 2015) calibrated ranges (Reimer et al. 2013) for the Start and End of the single burial tradition -- Table 5.4 Brindley's PCDR and FCDR s (Brindley 2007) -- Table 5.5 OxCal 4.2(Bronk Ramsey 2015) calibrated ranges (Reimer et al. 2013) for the Start and End dates of single burial tradition funerary vessels at 95.4% and 68.2% -- Table 5.6 OxCal 4.2 (Bronk Ramsey 2015) calibrated ranges(Reimer et al. 2013) for the start and end dates of decorative techniques from single burial tradition funerary vessels at 95.4% and 68.2%, using dating samples directly associated with the vessels. -- Figure 5.2 OxCal 4.2 (Bronk Ramsey 2015) multiplot of the calibrated ranges (Reimer et al. 2013) of dates associated with vessels displaying Defined Decorative Motifs. Red line shows a best fit line through the calibrated ranges.Table 5.7 OxCal 4.2 (Bronk Ramsey 2015) calibrated ranges (Reimer et al. 2013) for the Start and End dates of Defined / Undefined decoration from single burial tradition funerary vessels at 95.4% and 68.2%, using dating samples directly associated with th -- Figure 5.3 OxCal 4.2(Bronk Ramsey 2015) multiplot of the calibrated ranges (Reimer et al. 2013) of dates associated with cist burials. Red line shows a best fit line through the calibrated ranges. -- Table 5.8 OxCal 4.2(Bronk Ramsey 2015) calibrated ranges (Reimer et al. 2013) for the start and end dates of cists and pits at 95.4% and 68.2%, using dating samples directly associated with the vessels. -- Table 5.9 OxCal 4.2(Bronk Ramsey 2015) calibrated ranges (Reimer et al. 2013) for the start and end dates of cists by province at 95.4% and 68.2%, using dating samples directly associated with the vessels. -- Figure 5.4 OxCal 4.2 (Bronk Ramsey 2015) multiplot of the calibrated ranges (Reimer et al. 2013) of dates associated with inhumation burials. Red line shows a best fit line through the calibrated range -- Table 5.10 OxCal 4.2 (Bronk Ramsey 2015) date ranges for the start and end of single burial tradition inhumation and cremation -- Figure 5.5 OxCal 4.2 (Bronk Ramsey 2015) multiplot of the calibrated ranges (Reimer et al. 2013) of dates associated with cremation burials. -- Table 5.11 OxCal 4.2 (Bronk Ramsey 2015) date ranges for the start and end of pot-less burials -- Figure 5.6 Phasing scheme of the single burial tradition, with Needham's (1996) scheme for the British Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age and O'Brien's Irish Chalcolithic scheme. -- Figure 5.7 Oxcal 4.2 multiplot showing the radiocarbon dates of all vessels with reliable dates in the data set. -- Chapter 6 Analysis -- Introduction -- Relative frequency of grave types, their size and shape -- Frequency of basic grave classes.Burial in the landscape.This book describes and analyses the increasing complexity of later Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age burial in Ireland, using burial complexity as a proxy for increasing social complexity, and as a tool for examining social structure.Queen's University Belfast Irish Archaeological Monograph Copper ageBurialIrelandCopper age.Burial930.15McSparron Cormac1596723MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910828055803321Burials and society in late Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age Ireland3918202UNINA