02895nam 2200601Ia 450 991077708740332120230617024211.01-280-51505-897866105150591-84544-362-4(CKB)1000000000002843(EBL)289824(OCoLC)70728325(SSID)ssj0000465713(PQKBManifestationID)11338180(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000465713(PQKBWorkID)10439559(PQKB)11682416(MiAaPQ)EBC289824(Au-PeEL)EBL289824(CaPaEBR)ebr10058620(CaONFJC)MIL51505(EXLCZ)99100000000000284320041016d2004 my 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrExtending the food desert debate[electronic resource] /guest editors, Graham Clarke and David Bennison[Bradford, England] Emerald Group Pub.20041 online resource (72 p.)International journal of retail & distribution management ;v. 32, no. 2, 2004, special issueDescription based upon print version of record.0-86176-937-6 Contents; Abstracts & keywords; Extending the food desert debate Guest editorial; Food retail change and the growth of food deserts: a case study of Cardiff; Retail competition and consumer choice: contextualising the ''food deserts'' debate; Measuring convenience: Scots' perceptions of local food and retail provision; Food access and dietary variety among older people; The Leeds ''food deserts'' intervention study: what the focus groups reveal''Food deserts'' in British cities are partly the result of the expansion of multiple food retailing. New large stores force smaller stores to close down, thus depriving local residents of food shopping opportunities. Examines this proposition through an analysis of changes in consumer access to food shopping in Cardiff over the last 20 years. Shows that although accessibility scores have increased in Cardiff since 1980 they have increased at a faster rate in higher income areas. In a pocket of deprived areas accessibility has declined over the decade. Thus, there has been a polarisation effecInternational journal of retail & distribution management ;v. 32, no. 2, 2004, special issue.Retail tradeConsumer behaviorRetail trade.Consumer behavior.658.8658.8082Clarke Graham554722Bennison David1507654MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910777087403321Extending the food desert debate3773493UNINA