00849nam0 2200229 450 00002066320180703152124.020081217d1908----km-y0itay50------bay-------001yyAppunti sull'esercizio economico degli apparati motoricorso complementare macchinisti 1907-908parte 2.Cesare BeriniLivornoTipo-litografia della R. Accademia Navale1908529 p.25 cmmanoscrittoAppunti sull'esercizio economico degli apparati motori47624Navigazione623.87219Berini,Cesare340845ITUNIPARTHENOPE20081217RICAUNIMARC000020663623.872/104 (2) As. i.PIST2008Appunti sull'esercizio economico degli apparati motori47624UNIPARTHENOPE00971nam0-2200277 --450 991073389270332120230725105252.088-7166-723-9IT2003-856320230725d2003----kmuy0itay5050 baitaIT 001yyEugenio Garin: il percorso storiografico di un maestro del Novecentogiornata di studio, Prato, Biblioteca Roncioniana, 4 maggio 2002a cura di Felicita Audisio e Alessandro SavorelliFirenzeLe lettere°2003!139 p.23 cmGiornale critico della filosofia italiana. Quaderni10Audisio,FelicitaSavorelli,Alessandro<1948- >ITUNINAREICATUNIMARCBK9910733892703321DFT D02 AUDF 01FLFBCFLFBCEugenio Garin: il percorso storiografico di un maestro del Novecento3400372UNINA02627nam 2200577z- 450 99654035340331620231214133456.0(CKB)4920000000095310(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/44600(EXLCZ)99492000000009531020202102d2019 |y 0engurmn|---annantxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierDeceptive Conducts before the Patent OfficeChallenges for Patent Law and Competition LawNomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG20191 electronic resource (335 p.)Munich Intellectual Property Law Center – MIPLC3-8487-6134-3 3-7489-0257-3 In an increasingly harmonized global patent landscape, few issues still distinguish the US patent system as much as its strict–and often criticized–duty of candor and its inequitable conduct doctrine. The EPO and most other countries around the world impose less burdensome disclosure duties upon patent applicants. What is there to learn from the experience in the US? Have these tools resulted in any benefit worth considering? Yet regardless of the disclosure duties imposed upon patent applicants, a deceptive conduct before the Patent Office could lead to unwarranted exclusive rights and have a negative impact on competition. Should antitrust law intervene? Is it a case of sham litigation? This work attempts to answer those questions through a comparative analysis, examining the law and case law in the US and in the EU from both a patent and a competition law perspective and seeking a workable theory of harm.pharmazeutischer Patientirreführendes VerhaltenWettbewerbsrechtPatentanmeldungPatentamthigh courtSupreme Courtinequitable conductCompetition Lawkristalline FormPatentrechtApotexWalker Processtert-Butylaminsalzduty of candorFraud before the Patent OfficePerindoprilScheincharakterAstraZenecaPatent OfficeServierLJ Jacobpatent lawHoss Eugenioauth1287687BOOK996540353403316Deceptive Conducts before the Patent Office3020297UNISA