00835nam a2200241 i 450099100362574970753620020503202019.0941212s1967 it ||| | ita b1053345x-39ule_instEXGIL124178ExLBiblioteca Interfacoltà itaMilano, Gildo469785Nebbia sulla Pedaggera /Gildo Milano[S.l.] :N. Milano,c1967272 p. ;22 cm.Giovane Resistenza ;11ResistenzaItalia.b1053345x21-02-1727-06-02991003625749707536LE002 Fondo Berg. 17031LE002-502Nle002-E0.00-no 00000.i1061260927-06-02Nebbia sulla Pedaggera217364UNISALENTOle00201-01-94ma -itait 0104228oam 2200673 450 991071609730332120220513142814.0(CKB)5470000002517127(OCoLC)936068841(EXLCZ)99547000000251712720160126d2013 ua 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierPatients with positive screening fecal occult blood tests evidence brief on the relationship between time delay to colonoscopy and colorectal cancer outcomes /Kim Peterson [and three others]Washington, DC :Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, Health Services Research & Development Service,2013.1 online resource (i, 20 pages) illustrations"Evidence-based synthesis program.""April 2013."Includes bibliographical references (pages 13-15)."The American Cancer Society estimates that colorectal cancer (CRC) will be the third most common cause of cancer death for both men and women in the U.S. in 2013. The natural history of the disease suggests that longer delays in CRC diagnosis will negatively influence stage at diagnosis and long-term survival. CRC may be diagnosed by screening asymptomatic patients or by evaluation of symptomatic patients. Previous studies investigating the influence of delays on survival or cancer stage at diagnosis have primarily focused on the evaluation of time from first symptom development in symptomatic patients and have demonstrated inconsistent results. For example, among 13 studies published between 1977 and 2006 included in a 2007 systematic review by Ramos and colleagues, 10 found no association between the symptom-to-diagnosis interval (SDI) and survival and the other three found that increased delays resulted in better chances of survival. As for the relationship between SDI and tumor stage, among 18 studies, 11 found no association, four found that shorter delays were associated with an earlier stage at diagnosis and three paradoxically found that a greater delay was associated with an earlier stage at diagnosis. As noted by Ramos et al., the SDI risk function is likely nonlinear and multifaceted, reflecting a complex interaction between tumor biology and location, the clinical course, patient behavior, and the functioning of the healthcare system, and the studies have varied in their methods for adjusting for these confounding factors. These findings highlight the importance of detecting colorectal cancer through screening, before symptoms appear"--Publisher's description.Patients with positive screening fecal occult blood tests Fecal occult blood testsUnited StatesColonoscopyUnited StatesColon (Anatomy)CancerUnited StatesOutcome assessment (Medical care)United StatesColon (Anatomy)CancerfastColonoscopyfastFecal occult blood testsfastOutcome assessment (Medical care)fastUnited StatesfastFecal occult blood testsColonoscopyColon (Anatomy)CancerOutcome assessment (Medical care)Colon (Anatomy)Cancer.Colonoscopy.Fecal occult blood tests.Outcome assessment (Medical care)Peterson Kim1385536United States.Department of Veterans Affairs.Health Services Research and Development Service,Portland VA Medical Center.Evidence-based Synthesis Program Center.Evidence-based Synthesis Program (U.S.)MMUMMUOCLCQGPOOCLCOOCLCFOCLCAOCLCQOCLCOGPOBOOK9910716097303321Patients with positive screening fecal occult blood tests3451620UNINA