01232oam 2200373I 450 991071196430332120190403142248.0(CKB)5470000002488448(OCoLC)1091358970(EXLCZ)99547000000248844820190403d2019 ua 0engurcn|||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierCentral Nigeria overcoming dangerous speech and endemic religious divides /by Ferdaouis BaggaWashington, D.C. :United States Commission on International Religious Freedom,2019.1 online resource (15 pages) color illustrations"February 2019."Central Nigeria Freedom of religionNigeriaSocial conflictNigeriaReligious aspectsFreedom of religionSocial conflictReligious aspects.Bagga Ferdaouis1388557United States Commission on International Religious Freedom,GPOGPOGPOBOOK9910711964303321Central Nigeria3439276UNINA02574aam 2200373 n 450 99108747499033212025061810222383-8142-164-0(CKB)4100000009585027(ceeol)ceeol849394(CEEOL)849394(EXLCZ)99410000000958502720252218d2019 ||l |polJurysprudencja 13. Prawo w przestrzeni normatywnejTadeusz BiernatŁódź [Poland] Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego20191 online resource (1 p. 172)Uniwersytet Łódzki83-8142-163-2 The paradigm of law in normative space makes it possible to develop a distinct view on many issues related to the traditionally understood areas of scientific reflection on law. When analysing the relations between law and the normative sphere (normative environment) today, the phenomenon of a normativity form and its characteristic features in a postmodern society deserve special attention. The question of the form of normativity is complementary with the question of whether and how the changing and distinctly shaped forms of normativity articulation affect the law, and lawmaking in particular. The normative environment and normative space, which are subject to their own dynamics, generate a broader discussion about law and its evaluation which includes another, “non-state law” as well as what the author refers to as the “normative sources of law”. Therefore, the discussion extends beyond the strictly-defined domain of systemic relationships which has become well-established over the years. One detailed and very important problem is that, in the field of discourse and normative content presentation, statements appear which not only relate to the individual elements of normative space, but also exhibit the characteristics of “normative claims”. In a reality characterized in this way, law is a bridge connecting “normative claims” with normativity external to the law.Law, Constitution, JurisprudencePhilosophy of LawSociological jurisprudenceLaw, Constitution, JurisprudencePhilosophy of LawSociological jurisprudence.Biernat Tadeusz1827551Central and Eastern European Online LibraryceeolceeolBOOK9910874749903321Jurysprudencja 13. Prawo w przestrzeni normatywnej4395698UNINA