01866oam 2200409 450 991070357290332120191127123034.0(CKB)5470000002431970(OCoLC)896881709(EXLCZ)99547000000243197020141125j201409 ua 0engurcn|||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierBackup power cost of ownership analysis and incombent technology comparison /J. Kurtz [and three others]Golden, CO :National Renewable Energy Laboratory,September 2014.1 online resource (ix, 21 pages) color illustrations, color mapsNREL/TP ;5400-60732"September 2014."Includes bibliographical references (pages 17-18).This cost of ownership analysis identifies the factors impacting the value proposition for fuel cell backup power and presents the estimated annualized cost of ownership for fuel cell backup power systems compared with the incumbent technologies of battery and diesel generator systems. The analysis compares three different backup power technologies (diesel, battery, and fuel cell) operating in similar circumstances in four run time scenarios (8, 52, 72, and 176 hours).Fuel cellsResearchElectric power systemsReliabilityCostsFuel cellsResearch.Electric power systemsReliabilityCosts.Kurtz Jennifer1388025National Renewable Energy Laboratory (U.S.),SOESOEOCLCFGPOBOOK9910703572903321Backup power cost of ownership analysis and incombent technology comparison3460541UNINA