02146oam 2200457 a 450 991069898880332120090615083300.0(CKB)5470000002397984(OCoLC)317613259(EXLCZ)99547000000239798420090402d2009 ua 0engurbn|||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierHuman capital[electronic resource] improved implementation of safeguards and an action plan to address employee concerns could increase employee acceptance of the National Security Personnel System : testimony before the Subcommittee on Readiness, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives /statement of Brenda S. Farrell[Washington, D.C.] :U.S. Govt. Accountability Office,[2009]9, 7 pages digital, PDF fileTestimony ;GAO-09-464TTitle from title screen (viewed April 2, 2009)."For release ... April 1, 2009."Includes summaries of previously issued GAO human capital reports.Includes bibliographical references.Examines the extent to which the Department of Defense (DOD) has implemented internal safeguards to ensure that the National Security Personnel System (NSPS) is a fair, effective, and credible method of evaluating its civilian personnel. Also discusses how DOD civilians perceive NSPS and what actions DOD has taken to address these perceptions.Human capital Human capitalUnited StatesMerit payGovernment policyUnited StatesHuman capitalMerit payGovernment policyFarrell Brenda S1383624United States.Congress.House.Committee on Armed Services.Readiness Subcommittee.United States.Government Accountability Office.AWCAWCAWCGPOBOOK9910698988803321Human capital3439539UNINA