03627 am 22006973u 450 991022735140332120200325181401.01-78374-286-0979-1-03-650965-01-78374-285-2(CKB)4100000000883826(MiAaPQ)EBC5216068(WaSeSS)IndRDA00120530(FrMaCLE)OB-obp-4597(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/29614(PPN)230000355(EXLCZ)99410000000088382620200603d2017 uy 0engurcnu||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierBasic knowledge and conditions on knowledge /Mark McBrideOpen Book Publishers2017Cambridge, England :Open Book Publishers,2017.1 online resource (240 pages)1-78374-284-4 1-78374-283-6 Includes bibliographical references and index.Part one. Exploring basic knowledge -- Reflections on Moore's 'proof' -- First reflections on the problem of easy knowledge -- The problem of easy knowledge: towards a solution -- Evidence and transmission failure -- A puzzle for dogmatism -- Part two. Conditions on knowledge: conclusive reasons, sensitivity, and safety -- Conclusive reasons -- Sensitivity -- Safety -- Safety: an application.McBride's book considers a variety of puzzles concerning immediate justification and knowledge. These puzzles are of active interest in the field, and it is useful to address them all in a single volume. I learned from this book, even when it covered issues I already knew well. ―Prof. Christopher Tucker, William & Mary University How do we know what we know? In this stimulating and rigorous book, Mark McBride explores two sets of issues in contemporary epistemology: the problems that warrant transmission poses for the category of basic knowledge; and the status of conclusive reasons, sensitivity, and safety as conditions that are necessary for knowledge. To have basic knowledge is to know (have justification for) some proposition immediately, i.e., knowledge (justification) that doesn't depend on justification for any other proposition. This book considers several puzzles that arise when you take seriously the possibility that we can have basic knowledge. McBride's analysis draws together two vital strands in contemporary epistemology that are usually treated in isolation from each other. Additionally, its innovative arguments include a new application of the safety condition to the law.Justification (Theory of knowledge)Knowledge, Theory ofCognitive science Newjustificationssafety conditionsensitivitybasic knowledgeepistemologyconclusive reasonsBrain in a vatCoherentismDogmaFallibilismFoundationalismFred DretskeInferenceLogical consequenceRobert NozickJustification (Theory of knowledge)Knowledge, Theory of.Cognitive science New.121McBride Mark927181WaSeSSWaSeSSBOOK9910227351403321Basic knowledge and conditions on knowledge2083234UNINA01579nam 2200445Ka 450 991069881000332120090604102946.0(CKB)5470000002397770(OCoLC)370377741(OCoLC)370376224(EXLCZ)99547000000239777020090604d1987 ua 0engtxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierAnalysis of NLR configurations using OCM for pilot modeling[electronic resource]West Lafayette, Ind. :Purdue University, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics ;[Washington, D.C.]:[National Aeronautics and Space Administration],[1987]1 volumeNASA-CR ;180656Title from title screen (viewed Jun. 3, 2009)Aircraft configurationsnasatAircraft performancenasatControllabilitynasatOptimal controlnasatPilot performancenasatAircraft configurations.Aircraft performance.Controllability.Optimal control.Pilot performance.Drajeske M. H1418439Purdue University.School of Aeronautics and Astronautics.United States.National Aeronautics and Space Administration.GPOGPOBOOK9910698810003321Analysis of NLR configurations using OCM for pilot modeling3529895UNINA